We evaluate the FES pressure prediction workflow using results from an evolutionary transient geomechanical model. The FES workflow couples velocities with geomechanical modeling to incorporate the effects of both mean and shear stress to pressure generation. The FES method predicts pore pressure and the full stress tensor. Because the FES workflow is iterative and requires data available on different grids (e.g., velocity vs. geomechanical results), we have developed a new tool in Horizon/Elfen to streamline the prediction process. In order to evaluate the workflow, we consider the end stage of the evolutionary model as the real basin. We use the geometry to build a static model. We use the evolutionary porosity field to calculate our real velocity field. We apply the VES method using this velocity field and the FES method using the velocity field and the static model. We find that the FES method predicts pressure values closer to the real basin pressures and performs better near a source-layer weld, where both mean and shear are non-uniaxial.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bowers, G. L.
    [1995] Pore Pressure Estimation From Velocity Data: Accounting for Overpressure Mechanisms Besides Undercompaction. SPE Drilling & Completion10(2), 89–95.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Heidari, M., Nikolinakou, M. and Flemings, P.
    [2018] Coupling geomechanical modeling with seismic pressure prediction. GEOPHYSICS83(5), B253-B267.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Issler, D. R.
    [1992] A new approach to shale compaction and stratigraphic restoration, Beaufort-Mackenzie Basin and Mackenzie Corridor, northern Canada. American Association of Petroleum Geologist Bulletin76(8), 1170–1189.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Muir Wood, D.
    [1990] Soil behaviour and critical state soil mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Nikolinakou, M. A., Heidari, M., Flemings, P. B. and Hudec, M. R.
    [2018] Geomechanical modeling of pore pressure in evolving salt systems. Marine and Petroleum Geology93, 272–286.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error