1887
  1. Home
  2. Conferences
  3. Conference Proceedings
  4. 81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2019
  5. Conference paper

Abstract

Summary

Random noise attenuation always played an important role in seismic data processing. This study introduces an effective deep learning approach for seismic noise attenuation. The method design a deep feed forward denoising convolutional neural networks with residual learning approach. It learns the noise from the noisy images instead of the latent clean images and obtains the denoised images by subtracting the learned residual from the noisy image. Moreover, the new representative achievements integrated with the residual learning include rectified linear unit and batch normalization. Then, we train the CNN model with poststack field datasets and use the model to suppress the random noise. The results of the field data reveal that the algorithm can remove the random noise and highlight the locally continuous reflectors without losing the resolution of these features.

© EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900851
2019-06-03
2024-04-25

  • From This Site

    /content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900851
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Fomel, S.
    , 2007, Shaping regularization in geophysical-estimation problems: Geophysics, 72, no. 2, R29–R36.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. HeK, ZhangX, RenS, et al.
    , 2015. Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition[J]. 770–778.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Gulunay, N.
    , 2000, Noncausal spatial prediction filtering for random noise reduction on 3D poststack data: Geophysics, 65, 1641–1653.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. KrizhevskyA, SutskeverI, HintonG E
    , 2012. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks[C]// International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Curran Associates Inc.1097–1105.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. LiuY, LiuN, LiuC
    2015, Adaptive prediction filtering int-x-ydomain for random noise attenuation using regularized nonstationary autoregression: Geophysics, 80(1), no.1 13–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. LecunY, BengioY, HintonG
    2015. Deep learning[J]. Nature, 521(7553):436.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. IoffeS, SzegedyC
    , 2015. Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift[J]. 448–456.
  8. Neelamani, R., A. I.Baumstein, D. G.Gillard, M. T.Hadidi, and W. L.Soroka
    , 2008, Coherent and random noise attenuation using the curvelet transform: The Leading Edge, 27, 240–248.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Trickett, S., and L.Burroughs
    , 2009, Prestack rank-reduction-based noise suppression: CSEG Recorder, 34, 24–31.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang, R., and T.Ulrych
    , 2003, Physical wavelet frame denoising: Geophysics, 68, 225–231.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900851
Loading
Seismic Image Denoising Using Convolutional Neural Network with Residual Learning Approach
Conference Proceedings 2019, 1 (2019); https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201900851
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900851
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900851
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error