1887

Abstract

Summary

Reflection full waveform inversion has become an effective tool to generate low-wavenumber deep model update using reflected energy and to improve seismic imaging, especially in the subsalt area. However it is still a challenging inverse problem that suffers from local minima issues. To tackle this problem, we propose a new weighted traveltime based objective function with the correction of the kinematic errors between the synthetic and real data, instead of simply minimizing the data residual for least squares objective function. Therefore it helps avoid cycle skipping issues to overcome some of the problems with local minima and relaxes the requirement for successful inversion. Additionally, we propose a preconditioned optimization scheme to mitigate the artifacts from the kernel of reflection full waveform inversion and improve convergence rate with better results. We compare synthetic examples to demonstrate the benefits. The field example shows successful low wavenumber update from reflections with improved subsalt images.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900868
2019-06-03
2020-04-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Biondi, B. and Almomin, A.
    [2014] Simultaneous inversion of full data bandwidth by tomographic fullwaveform inversion. Geophysics, 79(3), WA129–WA140.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Huang, H., Symes, W. and Nammour, R.
    [2016] Matched source waveform inversion: Volume extension. Expanded Abstracts, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Dallas, TX, 1364–1368.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hudson, J. and Heritage, J.
    [1980] The use of the Born approximation in seismic scattering problems. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 66, 221–240.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Luo, Y., Ma, Y., Wu, Y., Liu, H. and Cao, L.
    [2016] Full-traveltime inversion. Geophysics, 81(5).
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Luo, Y. and Schuster, G.
    [1991] Wave-equation traveltime inversion. Geophysics, 56, 645–653.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Shen, P. and Symes, W.
    [2008] Automatic velocity analysis via shot profile migration. Geophysics, 73(5), VE49–VE59.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Tarantola, A.
    [1984] Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation. Geophysics, 49(8), 1259–1266.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Van Leeuwen, T. and Hermann, F.
    [2013] Mitigating local minima in full-waveform inversion by expanding the search space. Geophysical Journal International, 195(1).
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Vigh, D., Jiao, K., Cheng, X., Sun, D. and Lewis, W.
    [2016] Earth-model building from shallow to deep with full-waveform inversion. The Leading Edge, 35, 1025–1030.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang, C., Yingst, D., Farmer, P. and Leveille, J.
    [2016] Full-waveform inversion with the reconstructed wavefield method. Expanded Abstracts, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Dallas, TX, 1237.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Warner, M. and Guasch, L.
    [2016] Adaptive waveform inversion: Theory. Geophysics, 81(6), R429.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Xu, S., Wang, D., Chen, F., Zhang, Y. and Lambare, G.
    [2012] Full Waveform Inversion for Reflected Seismic Data. Expanded Abstracts, EAGE, Copenhagen.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900868
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900868
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error