1887

Abstract

Summary

One of the type of well-known smart waterflooding is injection of different nanoparticles mixed with low-salinity or formation water. Previous studies showed a good potential of the nanoparticles as EOR method. But the biggest restriction of full-field applying is the cost of the nanoparticles. We found out that products of different factories, electric power plants etc. could be used as the nanoparticles for EOR technologies and expenses for its preparation are much lower.

This paper presents the results of laboratory studies and 3D simulation of water injection with Ca, Si and Al-based nanoparticles into a carbonate oil reservoir. Laboratory studies included preparation of cores, scanning of cores and double core flooding using formation water and the same water with nanoparticles. Then the injection was simulated at 3D pilots of the carbonate reservoir of the Romashkinskoe field.

Laboratory tests and 3D simulation showed that the incremental oil recovery with injection of the nanoparticles is around 15–27% (displacement coefficient) and 2–5% (recovery factor) respectively. The nanoparticles are much smaller than pore throats. Thus, we assume that the effect could be explained by reduction of interfacial tension and some wettability alteration.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900963
2019-06-03
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Eftekhari, A.A., Krastev, R., Farajzadeh, R.
    Foam Stabilized by Fly-Ash Nanoparticles for Enhancing Oil Recovery, 2015, SPE-175382-MS, DOI: 10.2118/175382‑MS.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/175382-MS [Google Scholar]
  2. El-Diasty, A.I. and Aly, A.M.
    Understanding the Mechanism of Nanoparticles Applications in Enhanced Oil Recovery, 2015, SPE-175806-MS, DOI: 10.2118/175806‑MS.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/175806-MS [Google Scholar]
  3. Hendraningrat, L., Shidong, L., Torsater, O.
    Effect of Some Parameters Influencing Enhanced Oil Recovery Process using Silica Nanoparticles: An Experimental Investigation, 2013, SPE-165955-MS, DOI: 10.2118/165955‑MS.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/165955-MS [Google Scholar]
  4. Hogeweg, A.S., Hincapie, R.E., Foedisch, H., Ganzer, L.
    Evaluation of Aluminium Oxide and Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles for EOR Applications, 2018, SPE-190872-MS, DOI: 10.2118/190872‑MS.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/190872-MS [Google Scholar]
  5. Skauge, T., Hetland, S., Spildo, K., Skauge, A.
    Nano-Sized Particles For EOR, 2010, SPE-129933-MS, DOI: 10.2118/129933‑MS.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/129933-MS [Google Scholar]
  6. Temizel, C., Putra, D., Zhang, M., Moreno, R.
    Smart Nanoparticles for Conformance Improvement in Waterflooding, 2017, SPE-186889-MS, DOI: 10.2118/186889‑MS.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/186889-MS [Google Scholar]
  7. Turkenburg, D., Chin, P.T.K., Fischer, H.
    Use of Modified Nanoparticles in Oil and Gas Reservoir Management, 2012, SPE-157120-MS, DOI: 10.2118/157120‑MS.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/157120-MS [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900963
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900963
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error