1887

Abstract

Summary

This petrophysical study evaluated a carbonate reservoir using geological information, geophysical well logs and laboratory experimental data. This reservoir is in the post-salt layer of the Campos Basin - Southeast Brazil. Based on density, neutron and sonic logs, different approaches were used to determine the porosity. Likewise, the nuclear magnetic resonance log was also used to evaluate porosity and permeability using different approaches. Subsequently, all these parameters were compared between them and with laboratory data. The results show that estimate porosity is simpler than permeability, because porosity is easily determined with a multiple linear regression while permeability only with a multiple polynomial regression.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900981
2019-06-03
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abreu, C.
    2015. Porosity estimate and classification using geophysical well logs applied to the Albian carbonates of Campos Basin. Master Thesis, UENF, Macae-RJ, 100p. (In Portuguese).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alberty, M.
    1994. Standard interpretation; part 4-wireline methods, in D.Morton-Thompson and A. M.Woods, Eds., Development Geology Reference Manual: AAPG Methods in Exploration Series10, p. 180–185.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bruhn, C; Gomes, J.; Lucchese, C.C. and Johann, P.
    2003. Campos Basin: reservoir characterization and management-historical overview and future challenges. Offshore Technology Conference. OTC 15220.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Coates, G; Xiao, L. and Prammer, M. G.
    1999. NMR logging: principles and applications. Halliburton Energy Services, Gulf Professional Publishing, Houston, 253p.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Scott, H; Wright, P.; Thornton, J.; Olesen, J.; Hertzog, R; McKeon, D.; DasGupta, T. and Albertin, I.
    1994. Response of a multidetector pulsed neutron porosity tool. Transaction of the SPWLA 35th Annual Logging Symposium, Tulsa-OK, USA, paper J.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Schlumberger
    . 2013. Log interpretation charts. Educational Services. USA, 306 p.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Tavares, F.
    2015. Comparative study of the different estimates of permeability from well logs in carbonate reservoirs. Graduate thesis, UENF, Macae-RJ, 98p. (In Portuguese).
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Timur, A.
    1968. An investigation of permeability, porosity, and residual water saturation relationships for sandstone reservoirs. The Log Analyst IX, SPWLA, v.ix, n.4, a.2.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Wyllie, M., Gregory, A. and Gardner, L.
    1956. Elastic wave velocities in heterogeneous and porous media. Geophysics21(1):41–70.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900981
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900981
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error