1887

Abstract

Summary

There are two important flow model associated with the horizontal and deviated wells, i.e, stratified flow and dispersed flow. Since the two types of flow pattern often exchange with each other under certain conditions, it is of great significance to improve the oil migration efficiency by studying the oil-water two-phase flow. In specific, the initial change is due to the interface waves breakage that produces droplets, which contain oil droplets in the oil phase and water droplets in the water phase. In this paper, by analyzing the force situation before and after the breakage of two-phase interface wave in inclined pipeline, the prediction formula of combined force on the flow direction of interface wave is theoretically derived, and the relationship among combined force, wave amplitude, and wavelength is obtained by calculating the equation. The following conclusions are drawn:

  • 1)  The deformation and breakage are influenced by the balance between drag force, interfacial tension, gravity, and buoyancy.
  • 2)  The deformation and breakage are more likely to occur as the inclination angle of the well increases.
  • 3)  The phenomenon of liquid droplet formation occurs on the long wave; the interface wave becomes unstable and damaged with the wave amplitude increases.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901092
2019-06-03
2020-08-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al-WahaibiT and AngeliP
    (2007) Transition between stratified and non-stratified horizontal oil-water flows. Part I: Stability analysis. Chem. Eng. Sci., 62:2915–2928.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-WahaibiT, SmithM and AngeliP
    (2007) Transition between stratified and non-stratified horizontal oil-water flows. Part II: Mechanism of drop formation. Chem. Eng. Sci., 62:2929–2940.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Al-WahaibiT, YusufN, Al-WahaibiY et al.
    (2012) Experimental study on the transition between stratified and non-stratified horizontal oil-water flow. Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 38:126–135.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BernaC, EscriváA, Muñoz-CoboJ L et al.
    (2015) Review of droplet entrainment in annular flow: Characterization of the entrained droplets. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 79:64–86.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. HolowachM J, HochreiterL E and CheungF B
    (2002) A model for droplet entrainment in heated annular flow. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 23:807–822.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. IshiiM and GrolmesMA
    (1975) Inception criteria for droplet entrainment in two-phase concurrent film flow. Al. ChE. J., 21:308–318.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. KataokaI, IshiiM and MishimaK
    (1983) Generation and size distribution of droplet in annular two-phase flow. J. Fluids Eng., 105:230–238.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. SunX, SmithT R, KimS, IshiiM, UhleJ
    (2003) Interfacial structure of air-water two-phase flow in a relatively large pipe. Experiments in Fluids, 34:226–219.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901092
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901092
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error