1887

Abstract

Summary

The ability to solve jointly lithology units and elastic parameters has been shown to improve characterization when a detailed background model is difficult to build. Petrophysical parameters can also be resolved if lithology driven rock model is available. For anisotropic formations, using joint litho-petro-elastic (LPE) inversion enables us to assign anisotropy information to the lithology units. This proves to be very beneficial for AVA/AVAz inversion where the azimuthal invariant anisotropic parameter space (the vertical transverse isotropy (VTI)) is not resolvable independently from shear information. In many cases, neglecting to account for anisotropy will lead to inferior characterization of anisotropic plays. Anisotropic LPE inversion enables anisotropic characterization by identifying the anisotropic formation as a part of the inversion process. Moreover, LPE inversion also provide estimates of the petrophysical parameter space and therefore honor the relation between the anisotropic elasticity, lithology and petrophysical parameters.

This study review the LPE inversion workflow and show how the anisotropic LPE inversion in VTI media is used to derive jointly elastic properties, lithology, and petrophysical parameters of the Wolfcamp shale play. We also demonstrate the importance of including anisotropy in the inversion and show that isotropic inversion poorly delineated the lithology of the play.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901143
2019-06-03
2020-01-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bachrach, R.
    [2018] Nonlinear single loop litho-petro-elastic prestack inversion using data assimilation techniques. 80th Conference and Exhibition, EAGE, Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , [2006] Joint estimation of porosity and saturation using stochastic rock physics modeling. Geophysics, 71(5) O53–O63.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. [2017] Application of sequential and Kalman filters for seismic-geomechanics reservoir monitoring. 88th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 5928–5932.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Kemper, M. and Gunning, J.
    [2014] Joint impedance and facies inversion–seismic inversion redefined. First Break32(9), 89–95.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Rimstad, K., Avseth, P. and More, H.
    [2012] Hierarchical Bayesian lithology/fluid prediction: A North Sea case study. Geophysics, 77, B69–B85.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Sayers, C and DasguptaS.
    , [2018], Rock physics of Wolfcamp formation, Delaware basin, SEG technical program and expended abstracts, 3653–3659.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901143
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901143
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error