1887

Abstract

Summary

Impedance inversion is one of the most efficient tools to predict and characterize oil and gas reservoirs. Small faults have the ability to reveal the high-resolution information on the target reservoir. However, the impedance information of small faults is always hidden during standard inversion process. Instead, diffracted wavefield indicate high-resolution information beyond reflected wavefield, yet it is biased by reflection-oriented migration. Usually, in the standard inversion scheme, the input is the migrated data and the impedance of small faults is distorted. Therefore, a novel approach is proposed to improve impedance inversion results using the unmigrated data and diffracted wavefield. The input data for inversion is a zero-offset section with identified diffraction events. Forward modelling, designed for the impedance inversion, includes the classical specular reflection plus asymptotic diffraction modelling schemes. A synthetic model, with the fault of half of the wavelength, shows the validation of this novel approach to improve the resolution and accuracy of impedance inversion.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901209
2019-06-03
2020-05-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Dell, S., and Gajewski, D.
    [2011] Common-reflection-surface-based workflow for diffraction imaging. Geophysics, 76, S187–S195.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Fomel, S., Landa, E., and Taner, M. T.
    [2007] Poststack velocity analysis by separation and imaging of seismic diffractions. Geophysics, 72, U89–U94.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Francis, A.
    [2006] Understanding stochastic inversion: Part 2. First Break, 24, 79–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Gray, S. H., Etgen, J., Dellinger, J., and Whitmore, D.
    [2001] Seismic migration problems and solutions. Geophysics, 66, 1622–1640.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hilterman, F. J.
    [1970] Three-dimensional seismic modeling. Geophysics, 35, 1020–1037.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Keller, J. B.
    [1962] Geometrical theory of diffraction. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 52, 116–130.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Khaidukov, V., Landa, E., and Moser, T. J.
    [2004] Diffraction imaging by focusing-defocusing: An outlook on seismic superresolution. Geophysics, 69, 1478–1490.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Klem-Musatov, K.D., and AizenbergA.M.
    [1984] The ray method and the theory of edge waves. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 79, 35–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Landa, E.
    [2012] Seismic diffraction: where's the value?. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2012, 1–4.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Landa, E., Shtivelman, V., and Gelchinsky, V.
    [1987] A method for Detection of Diffracted Waves on Common Offset Sections. Geophysical Prospecting, 35, 359–374.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ma, X. Q.
    [2002] Simultaneous inversion of prestack seismic data for rock properties using simulated annealing. Geophysics, 67, 1877–1885.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Moser, T. J., and Howard, C. B.
    [2008] Diffraction imaging in depth. Geophysical Prospecting, 56, 627–641.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Trorey, A. W.
    [1970] A simply theory for seismic diffractions. Geophysics, 35, 762–784.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Van der Burg, D., Verdel, A., and Wapenaar, K.
    [2009] Ray-based stochastic inversion of prestack seismic data for improved reservoir characterization. Geophysics, 74, R85–R97.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901209
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901209
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error