1887

Abstract

Summary

While full waveform inversion (FWI) can provide high resolution velocity models, the method is often let down by the cycle skipping problem. Several solutions based on the estimation of the time shifts have been proposed. Among them, dynamic warping FWI (D-FWI) combines the dynamic warping for the computation of the time shifts between the observed and the predicted data, and a technique which partially warps the observed data to connect the predicted data in a cycle skipping-free way. However, the D-FWI still risks falling into local minima, in particular when the initial model is inaccurate and low-frequency data are missing. Here, we propose a more robust process for estimating the time shifts in which dynamic warping is repeated with offset dependent constraints. The more reliably detected time shifts, can be used in D-FWI with a waveform-based or a traveltime-based objective function to better manage the cycle-skipping problem. We demonstrate the method with a synthetic data from the Marmousi model as well as one challenging OBC dataset from Indonesia.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901223
2019-06-03
2020-08-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allemand, T., Sedova, A. and Hermant, O.
    [2017] Flattening common image gathers after full-waveform inversion: The challenge of anisotropy estimation. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2017, 1410–1415.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baek, H., Calandra, H. and Demanet, L.
    [2014] Velocity estimation via registration-guided least-squares inversion. Geophysics, 79(2), R79–R89.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hale, D.
    [2013] Dynamic warping of seismic images. Geophysics, 78(2), S105–S115.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Luo, Y. and Schuster, G.T.
    [1991] Wave-equation traveltime inversion. Geophysics, 56(5), 645–653.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ma, Y. and Hale, D.
    [2013] Wave-equation reflection traveltime inversion with dynamic warping and full-waveform inversionWERTI with dynamic warping. Geophysics, 78(6), R223–R233.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ratcliffe, A., Win, C., Vinje, V., Conroy, G., Warner, M., Umpleby, A., Stekl, I., Nangoo, T. and Bertrand, A.
    [2011] Full waveform inversion: A North Sea OBC case study. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2011, 2384–2388.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Sirgue, L., Barkved, O., van Gestel, J., Askim, O. and Kommedal, J.
    [2009] 3D waveform inversion on Valhall wide-azimuth OBC. 71st EAGE Conference and Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. van Leeuwen, T. and Mulder, W.
    [2010] A correlation-based misfit criterion for wave-equation travel-time tomography. Geophysical Journal International, 182(3), 1383–1394.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Virieux, J. and Operto, S.
    [2009] An overview of full-waveform inversion in exploration geophysics. Geophysics, 74(6), WCC1–WCC26.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang, M., Xie, Y., Xu, W.Q., Loh, F.C., Xin, K., Chuah, B.L., Manning, T. and Wolfarth, S.
    [2016] Dynamic-warping full-waveform inversion to overcome cycle skipping. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2016, 1273–1277.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Warner, M. and Guasch, L.
    [2016] Adaptive waveform inversion: Theory. Geophysics, 81(6), R429–R445.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhang, Z., Mei, J., Lin, F., Huang, R. and Wang, R.
    [2018] Correcting for salt misinterpretation with full-waveform inversion. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2018, 1143–1147.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901223
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901223
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error