Microseismic Magnitudes: Challenges in Determining the Correct Moment and Operating Regulatory Frameworks

References

1. Bishop, I., Styles, P. & Allen, M.
   , 1993. Mining-induced seismicity in the Nottinghamshire Coalfield. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 26(4), pp.253–279.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Brune, J.N.
   , 1970. Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes. Journal of Geophysical Research, 75(26), pp.4997–5009.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Butcher, A. et al.
   , 2017. Local Magnitude Discrepancies for Near-Event Receivers: Implications for the U.K. Traffic-Light Scheme. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 107(2), pp.532–541.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Deichmann, N.
   , 2017. Theoretical Basis for the Observed Break in Ml/ Mw Scaling between Small and Large Earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 107(2), pp.505–520.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Dost, B., Edwards, B. & Bommer, J.J.
   , 2018. The Relationship between M and ML: A Review and Application to Induced Seismicity in the Groningen Gas Field, The Netherlands. Seismological Research Letters
   [Google Scholar]
6. Hanks, T.C. & Kanamori, H.
   , 1979. A moment magnitude scale. Journal of Geophysical Research, 84(B5), pp.2348–2350.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Hutton, L.K. & Boore, D.M.
   , 1987. The Ml Scale in Southern California. Bulletin Of The Seismological Society Of America, 77(6), pp.2074–2094.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Stork, A.L. & Ito, H.
   , 2004. Source parameter scaling for small earthquakes observed at the western Nagano 800-m-deep borehole, Central Japan. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 94(5), pp.1781–1794.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Verdon, J.P. et al.
   , 2018. Seismicity induced by longwall coal mining at the Thoresby Colliery, Nottinghamshire, U.K.Geophysical Journal International, 212(2), pp.942–954.
   [Google Scholar]