1887

Abstract

Summary

Natural fracture networks are commonly observed in tight carbonate and chalk reservoirs and are believed to have significant impact on the effective permeability and potential fluid flow behavior. For instance, production from chalk fields in the North Sea is believed to be aided by the presence of natural fracture systems. Apart from enhancing production, fractures can also result in channelized fluid flow and early water break-through. In this study, we propose a multiscale and data-driven workflow of automated fault extraction, image log interpretation and both inverse and forward modelling, to characterize and quantify potential inter-well fracture network geometries and densities. The workflow is exemplified on the Ekofisk chalk field situated in the Norwegian North Sea. The seismic and well data show that the Ekofisk fault and fracture system forms a connected system, which can be subdivided into four main structural orientations. Inverse modeling suggests that the orientations of the fracture/fault system can be explained by three separate normal faulting events. By implementing the structural data into a forward simulation, we characterize the potential inter-well fracture/fault network highlighting that fractures occur in clustered zones which follow the four main observed orientations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901301
2019-06-03
2020-08-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Boe, T. H.
    (2012). Enhancement of large faults with a windowed 3D Radon transform filter. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2012, 1–5. http://doi.org/10.1190/segam2012-1008.1
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bounaim, A., Bø, T. H., Athmer, W., Sonneland, L., & Knoth, O.
    (2013). We-06–05 Large Fault Extraction Using Point Cloud Approach to a Seismic Enhanced Discontinuity Cube. Eage ’13, (June 2013), 10–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Maerten, L., & Maerten, F.
    (2006). Chronologic modeling of faulted and fractured reservoirs using geomechanically based restoration: Technique and industry applications. AAPG Bulletin, 90(8), 1201–1226. http://doi.org/10.1306/02240605116
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Maerten, L., Maerten, F., Lejri, M., & Gillespie, P.
    (2016). Geomechanical paleostress inversion using fracture data. Journal of Structural Geology, 89, 197–213. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2016.06.007
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Toublanc, A., Renaud, S., Sylte, J. E., Clausen, C. K., Eiben, T., & Nådland, G.
    (2005). Ekofisk Field: fracture permeability evaluation and implementation in the flow model. Petroleum Geoscience, 11(4), 321–330. http://doi.org/10.1144/1354-079304-622
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901301
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901301
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error