1887

Abstract

Summary

A Monte Carlo modelling approach for including fault seal and fault reactivation risk in trap evaluation is described. The model reduces the problem to a 1D analysis using a structural description depth-referenced to the crest of the prospect. Both juxtaposition and membrane fault seal are calculated, and any potential hydrodynamic effects on fault seal also included. A complementary geomechanical model is used to evaluate fault reactivation and mechanical top seal failure risk. The impact of both fault seal and fault reactivation on trapped column height is calculated and compared in a roll-up of results that also includes the potential columns constrained by capillary and mechanical top seals. The output is a predicted hydrocarbon column height distribution for a trap. The technique additionally offers insight into the potential fluid phase fractionation that may occur due to the active leakage mechanisms, thereby enabling gas vs oil column heights and their respective controls to be included in the prospect evaluation. This latter feature offers an update of the Seal Strength-Trap Closure approach championed by John Sales, by demonstrating how faults impact both the trapped hydrocarbon column and fluid phase partitioning.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901325
2019-06-03
2020-07-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barton, C.A. & Zoback, M.D.
    , 1995. Fluid Flow along potentially active faults in crystalline rock. Geology23, 683–686.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown, A.
    (2003). Capillary effects on fault-fill sealing. AAPG Bulletin87,381–395.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Morris, A., Ferrill, D.A., & Henderson, D.B.
    , 1996. Slip tendency and fault reactivation. Geology24, 275–278.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Sales, J.K.
    , 1997. Seal Strength vs Trap Closure – A fundamental Control on the Distribution of Oil and Gas in: R. C.Surdam ed., Seals, Traps and the Petroleum System, AAPG Memoir67, 57–83.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Sperrevik, S., Gillespie, P.A., Fisher, Q.J., Knipe, R.J., & Halvorsen, T.
    , 2002. Empirical estimation of fault rock properties. In: Koestler, A.G & Hunsdale, R. (eds), Hydrocarbon Seal Quantification, Norwegian Petroleum Society (NPF), Special Publications, 11, 109–125.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Yielding, G.
    , 2002. Shale Gouge ratio – calibration by geohistory. In: KoestlerA.G. & Hunsdale, R. (eds), Hydrocarbon Seal Quantification, Norwegian Petroleum Society Special Publication11, 1–15.
  7. , 2015. Trapping of buoyant fluids in fault-bound structures. In: Richards, F.L., Richardson, N.J., Rippington, S., Wilson, R.W., & Bond, C.E. (eds), Industrial Structural geology: principles, techniques and Integration. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 421, 29–39.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901325
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901325
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error