1887

Abstract

Summary

The conventional equation for 3D edge diffractions in the Cartesian coordinate system lacks angle information for studying the energy patterns in 3D seismic pre-stack data. Here, a new calculation method is presented for determining 3D edge diffraction coefficients in a spherical coordinate system that can formulate the coefficients according to the azimuth and emergence angles. Analysis of the edge diffraction coefficients variations with azimuth in the common shot domain reveals that the variation curves of the coefficients can be used to identify the trend of a fault. The phenomenon of polarity reversal of the edge diffraction coefficients is observed in the shot domain, and the coefficients in the common shot domain are more sensitive than in other domains.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901377
2019-06-03
2020-08-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AngonaF.A.
    , 1960, Two-dimensional modeling and its application to seismic problems: Geophysics, 25, no.2, 468–482, doi:10.1190/1.1438719.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1438719 [Google Scholar]
  2. DaleyP.F.
    , 2008, Numerical experiments in high frequency diffraction theory: CREWES Research Report, 20.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. DaltonD.R.
    , 1987, Derivation and Practical Application of Exact Time Domain Solution for Diffraction of Acoustic Waves by A Half Plane.
  4. KellerJ.B.
    , 1962, Geometrical theory of diffraction: Journal of the optical society of America, 52, no.2, 116–130, doi:10.1364/JOSA.52.000116.
    https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.52.000116 [Google Scholar]
  5. KlokovA. and S.Fomel
    , 2012, Separation and imaging of seismic diffractions using migrated dip-angle gathers: Geophysics, 77, no. 6, S131–S143, doi:10.1190/geo2012‑0017.1.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2012-0017.1 [Google Scholar]
  6. MerzlikinD., S. Fomel and A.Bona
    , 2016, Diffraction imaging using azimuthal plane-wave destruction: SEG international Exposition and Annual Meeting.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. NielsenP., F.If, P.Berg and O.Skovgaard
    , 2006, Using the pseudospectral method on curves grids for 2D elastic forward modeling: Geophysical Prospecting, 43, no.3, 369–395, doi:10.1111/j.1365‑2478.1995.tb00258.x.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1995.tb00258.x. [Google Scholar]
  8. TroreyA.W.
    , 1970, A simple theory for seismic diffractions: Geophysics, 35, no.5, 762–784, doi:10.1190/1.1440129.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440129. [Google Scholar]
  9. UmulY.Z.
    , 2005, Modified theory of physical optics approach to edge diffraction problems: Opt. Express, 13, no.1, 216–224, doi:10.1364/OPEX.13.000216.
    https://doi.org/10.1364/OPEX.13.000216. [Google Scholar]
  10. , 2007, Edge-dislocation waves in the edge diffractions process by an impedance half-plane: Journal of the Optical Society of America, 24, no.2, 507–511, doi:10.1364/JOSAA.24.000507.
    https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.24.000507. [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901377
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901377
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error