1887

Abstract

Summary

In reservoir monitoring, changes in seismic attributes are desirably associated with changes in reservoir properties. However, seismic data are also very sensitive to acquisition parameters, recording system and near-surface conditions, which can also change with time (“4D noise”). Match filters are routinely applied in 4D seismic processing to compensate for the phase and amplitude differences between baseline and monitor data to suppress the 4D noise and highlight actual changes in the subsurface. The conventional Least-Squares matching filter derived by minimizing the energy in the square of the difference between baseline and matched-monitor datasets has a number of shortcomings when applied to low signal-to-noise data e.g. when the filter is applied pre-stack and/or on low-fold data. These shortcomings include lack of symmetry with respect to interchange of base and monitor volumes, and the tendency to mute the energy of the matched seismic volume. Alternative methods referred to as a spectrum balancing match filters are developed that produce a matched monitor trace with the same power spectrum as the baseline. This concept is modified to tackle more complicated scenarios such as matching streamer and OBN data and developing joint matching and whitening filters that are applied to both datasets.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901585
2019-06-03
2020-07-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ayeni, G, and M.Nasser
    , 2009, Optimized local matching of time-lapse seismic data: A case study from the Gulf of Mexico: 79th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 3939–3943.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Druzhinin, A., and C.MacBeth
    , 2001, Robust cross-equalization of 4D-4C PZ migrated data at Teal South: 71st Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1670–1673.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Gallop, J.
    , 2011, Midpoint match filtering. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts2011: pp. 4170–4174.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hoeber, H, Lecerf, D., Zaghouani, Y., Whitcombe, D.
    (2005), Matching of multiple time-lapse data using multi-coherence analysis. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts2005
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Rickett, J. E., and D.Lumley
    , 2001, Cross-equalization data processing for time-lapse seismic reservoir monitoring: A case study from the Gulf of Mexico: Geophysics, 1015–1025.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ross, C. P., Cunningham, G B., and Weber, D. P.
    , 1996, Inside The Cross-Equalization Black Box: The Leading Edge, 15, 1233–1240.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Walden, A. and White, R
    , 1998, SeismicWavelet Estimation […], IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 36, No. 1,p.287.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901585
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901585
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error