1887

Abstract

Summary

Successful time-lapse studies require special care when it comes to the removal of undesirable artefacts caused by the differences in acquisition geometries. By attempting to repeat the source and receiver geometries between surveys as precisely as possible, any subsequent 4D noise is minimized. However, in some cases it is not possible to repeat the survey geometries between vintages. This is the case when a towed streamer survey is compared with an OBS acquisition. The image domain approach for correcting illumination differences between 4D datasets builds on wave equation reflectivity inversion using Point Spread Functions (PSFs). In this two-step least-squares imaging method, the reflectivity is recovered by explicitly computing multi-dimensional PSFs using wave-equation modeling and de-convolving these PSFs with the final migrated image.

We define a 4D formulation which is not dependent on geological and/or reservoir production constraints by introducing the concept of cross-survey PSFs (XPSFs). As shown using synthetic data examples, the joint reflectivity inversion process delivers superior results when compared to separate inversions as it ensures a more robust recovery of the 4D effects. The presented new methodology using cross-survey Point Spread Functions (XPSFs) ensures consistency of the wavefields for recovering the 4D signal.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901587
2019-06-03
2020-03-31
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ayeni, G., and Biondi, B
    . [2010] Target-oriented joint least-squares migration/inversion of time-lapse seismic data sets. 2010, Geophysics, 75(3) R61–R73.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Haacke, R. R., Casasanta, L., Hou, S. and HendersonJ. R
    . [2017] Dip-angle image filtering for 4D processing of towed-streamer and OBN datasets, First EAGE Workshop on Practical Reservoir Monitoring, Th PRM07.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Oristaglio, M.L.
    , SEAM Update: Integrated reservoir and geophysical modelling: SEAM Time Lapse and SEAM Life of Field, [2016] The Leading Edge, 35(10), 912–915.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Smit, D., Oppert, S., Stefani, J., Artus, V., Herwanger, J., Popov, P., Bottrill, A., Tan, L., Hu, W., Liu, J., Abriel, W., Detomo, R., Barkhouse, W., and Oristaglio, M.L
    . [2017] Large scale numerical simulation of reservoir monitoring – SEAM Time Lapse, First EAGE Workshop on Practical Reservoir Monitoring,, Th PRM13.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Valenciano, A.A., Biondi, B., and Guitton, A.
    , [2006] Target oriented wave-equation inversion, Geophysics, 71(4) A35–A38.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901587
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901587
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error