1887
  1. Home
  2. Conferences
  3. Conference Proceedings
  4. 81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2019
  5. Conference paper

Abstract

Summary

Deep learning and deep convolutional neural network (CNN) models have shown promising results and are gaining popularity in the geoscientific community. In contrast to traditional machine learning methodologies based on a suite of carefully selected attributes, deep learning is based on the raw images themselves. Deep CNNs are currently the tools of choice for computer vision tasks such as self-driving cars. Unfortunately, deep learning is encumbered by jargon that is unfamiliar to most geoscientists, providing black box applications resulting in two common reactions: deep learning models are the solution for everything or deep learning models are a modern fad that discards the interpreter's insight or experience with a given problem. In this presentation, we show that CNN models are based on attributes similar to those we use in seismic interpretation and remote sensing. We also show that through a process called transfer learning based on the analysis of 2D colour images, we can exploit much of the previous work developed for image recognition applications to rocks. We illustrate the successful use of transfer learning to microfossil classification, core description, petrographic analysis, and hand specimen identification. We also discuss some of the challenges in CNN analysis of 3D seismic data volumes.

© EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901607
2019-06-03
2024-04-25

  • From This Site

    /content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901607
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allen, D. B., and PranterM. J.
    [2016] Geologically constrained electrofacies classification of fluvial deposits: An example from the Cretaceous Mesaverde Group, Uinta and Piceance Basins. AAPG Bulletin, 100(12), 1775–1801, doi:10.1306/05131614229.
     https://doi.org/10.1306/05131614229 [Google Scholar]
  2. Kortström, J., UskiM., and Tiira,T.
    [2016] Automatic classification of seismic events within a regional seismograph network. Computers & Geosciences, 87, 22–30, doi:10.1016/J.CAGEO.2015.11.006.
     https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CAGEO.2015.11.006 [Google Scholar]
  3. LeCun, Y., BengioY., and Hinton, G.
    [2015] Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444, doi:10.1038/nature14539.
     https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539 [Google Scholar]
  4. de Matos, M. C., Yenugu, M., AngeloS.M., and Marfurt, K.
    [2011] Integrated seismic texture segmentation and cluster analysis applied to channel delineation and chert reservoir characterization. Geophysics, 76(5), P11–P21, doi:10.1190/geo2010‑0150.1.
     https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2010-0150.1 [Google Scholar]
  5. Qi, J., Lin, T., Zhao, T., Li, F., and Marfurt, K
    . [2016] Semisupervised multiattribute seismic facies analysis. I nterpretation, 4(1), SB91–SB106, doi:10.1190/INT‑2015‑0098.1.
     https://doi.org/10.1190/INT-2015-0098.1 [Google Scholar]
  6. Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., Berg, A. C., and Fei-Fei, L.
    [2015] ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge. International Journal of Computer Vision, 115(3), 211–252, doi:10.1007/s11263‑015‑0816‑y.
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y [Google Scholar]
  7. Sandler, M., Howard, A., Zhu, M., Zhmoginov, A., and Chen, L.C
    . [2018] MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks. ArXiv e-prints.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Sinha, S., Wen, Y., Pires de Lima, R. A., and Marfurt, K.
    [2018] Statistical controls on induced seismicity. In: Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, doi:10.15530/urtec‑2018‑2897507‑MS.
     https://doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2018-2897507-MS [Google Scholar]
  9. Tajbakhsh, N., Shin, J. Y., Gurudu, S. R., Hurst, R. T., Kendall, C. B., Gotway, M. B., and Liang, J.
    [2016] Convolutional Neural Networks for Medical Image Analysis: Full Training or Fine Tuning? IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 35(5), 1299–1312, doi:10.1109/TMI.2016.2535302.
     https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2016.2535302 [Google Scholar]
  10. TGS Salt Identification Challenge | Kaggle, n.d.: <https://www.kaggle.com/c/tgs-salt-identification-challenge> (accessed January10, 2019).
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Yosinski, J., Clune, J., Bengio, Y., and Lipson, H
    . [2014] How transferable are features in deep neural networks?Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 27, 3320–3328.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhao, T., Li, F., and Marfurt, K. J.
    [2017] Constraining self-organizing map facies analysis with stratigraphy: An approach to increase the credibility in automatic seismic facies classification. Interpretation, 5(2), T163–T171, doi:10.1190/INT‑2016‑0132.1.
     https://doi.org/10.1190/INT-2016-0132.1 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901607
Loading
Progress and Challenges in Deep Learning Analysis of Geoscience Images
Conference Proceedings 2019, 1 (2019); https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201901607
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901607
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901607
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error