1887
  1. Home
  2. Conference Proceedings
  3. Conference Proceedings
  4. 81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2019
  5. Conference paper

Abstract

Summary

Hyperbolic Radon transform being a time variant transform requires implementation in the time domain which is computationally expensive. To address this problem, we propose to use deep neural network for computing the velocity transform. The basic idea is to compute the inverse of Hessian using the Generative Adversarial network (GAN) for training data sets which can then be applied to the adjoint transform for test data sets to obtain a least-squares solution. This approach gives results similar to the least-squares inversion at a significantly reduced cost. Proposed algorithm is computationally efficient and cost effective as compared to the conventional time domain computation of the Hyperbolic Radon transform. Field data example verifies the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

© EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901616
2019-06-03
2020-07-10

  • From This Site

    /content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901616
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Blackman, R. B.
    , and J. W. Tukey, 1958, The measurement of power spectra: Dover Publications Inc.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Creswell, A., T.White, V.Dumoulin, K.Arulkumaran, B.Sengupta, and A. A.Bharath
    , 2018, Generative adversarial networks: An overview: IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 35, 53–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Fomel, S., P.Sava, I.Vlad, Y.Liu, and V.Bashkardin
    , 2013, Madagascar: Open-source software project for multidimensional data analysis and reproducible computational experiments: Journal of Open Research Software, 1.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Guitton, A.
    , 2004, Amplitude and Kinematic Corrections of Migrated Images for Nonunitary Imaging Operators: Geophysics, 69, 1017–1024.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Hu, J., S.Fomel, L.Demanet, and L.Ying
    , 2013, A Fast Butterfly Algorithm for Generalized Radon Transforms: Geophysics, 78, U41–U51.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Larner
    , K., 1979, Optimum-weight cdp stacking: Western Geco-physical Co.,unpublished notes.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Oliveira, D. A., R. S.Ferreira, R.Silva, and E. V.Brazil
    , 2018, Interpolating seismic data with conditional generative adversarial networks: IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 1–5.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Paszke, A., S.Gross, S.Chintala, G.Chanan, E.Yang, Z.DeVito, Z.Lin, A.Desmaison, L.Antiga
    , and A. Lerer, 2017, Automatic differentiation in pytorch: Presented at the NIPS-W.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Thorson, J. R., and J. F.Claerbout
    , 1985, Velocity-Stack and Slant-Stack Stochastic Inversion: Geophysics, 50, 2727–2741.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhu, J.-Y., T.Park, P.Isola, and A. A.Efros
    , 2017, Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks: arXiv preprint.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901616
Loading
A Fast Hyperbolic Radon Transform Algorithm Using Deep Neural Network
Conference Proceedings 2019, 1 (2019); https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201901616
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901616
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901616
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error