1887

Abstract

Summary

The estimation of permeabilities is a key objective of a well test. In Naturally Fractured Reservoirs (NFRs), this is particularly important because the permeability derived from pressure transient analysis can yield quantitatve information about the characteristics of both, the fractured and matrix system. In this study, we present new insights that enable us to understand the nature of the permeability values obtained from well testing in NFRs. We considered cases that are little explored in the literature like the impact of varying apertures along the fracture planes or disconnected fractures on the effective permeability of the fracture-matrix system. We showed that if only 5% of the fracture connections are closed, the fracture network no longer percolates, that is the fractures begin to act as isolated features and the effective total permeability of the fracture-matrix system is reduced significantly. We propose a way forward for distinguishing between connected and unconnected fracture networks, which uses the ratio of well test-derived permeability and the average core permeability. We suggest that if this ratio is larger than 10, the fracture network is likely to be connected while values below 10 likely correspond to either disconnected, poorly connected or very low-conductivity fracture networks.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901626
2019-06-03
2020-03-31
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. CincoL. H., SamaniegoV. F., & DominguezA. N.
    [1978]. Transient Pressure Behavior for a Well With a Finite-Conductivity Vertical Fracture. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/6014‑PA.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/6014-PA [Google Scholar]
  2. Corbett, P. W. M., Geiger, S., Borges, L., Garayev, M., & Valdez, C
    . [2012]. The third porosity system: Understanding the role of hidden pore systems in well-test interpretation in carbonates. Petroleum. Geoscience, 18(1), 73–81. http://doi.org/10.1144/1354-079311-010.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Egya, D. Geiger, S. Corbett, P, March, R. Bisdom, K. Bertotti, G.
    Bezerra, H., 2016. Assessing the Validity and Limitations of Dual-porosity Models Using Geological Well-testing in Fractured Formations. European Association of Geologists and Engineers. ThP711.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Kuchuk, F., & Biryukov, D.
    (2014). Pressure-Transient Behavior of Continuously and Discretely Fractured Reservoirs. SPE158096.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Warren, J.E. and Root, P.J
    . [1963]. The Behavior of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs. J.P.T, 245–255.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901626
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901626
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error