Prediction of Mechanical Properties of Soils on A Landslide Slope According to Electrical Resistivity Tomography and Cone Penetration Test

References

1. ГОСТ 19912-2012. Грунты. Методы полевых испытаний статическим и динамическим зондированием. – 2012.
   [Google Scholar]
2. ПетровН. Ф. и др.
   Оползни на автомобильной дороге М–7 «Волга» (Москва-Казань, 583–584 км) в правобережье Р. Сура в Чувашской Республике //Современные проблемы науки и образования. – 2012. – №. 6. – С. 625–625.
   [Google Scholar]
3. СП 11–105–97. «Инженерно-геологические изыскания для строительства. Часть I. «Общие правила производства работ» / Госстрой России. – М.: Производственный и научно- исследовательский институт по инженерным изысканиям в строительстве (ПНИИИС) Госстроя России, 1997.
   [Google Scholar]
4. ТарховА. Г.
   (ред.). Электроразведка: Справочник геофизика. – Недра, 1980.
5. DahlinT., SchälinD., TornborgJ.
   Mapping of quick clay by ERT and CPT-R in the Göta Älv river valley //Landslides in Sensitive Clays. – Springer, Dordrecht, 2014. – С. 217–228.
   [Google Scholar]
6. DonohueS. et al.
   Multi‐method geophysical mapping of quick clay //Near Surface Geophysics. – 2012. – Т. 10. – №. 3. – С. 207–219.
   [Google Scholar]
7. LavalleL. V. A., BortolozoC. A., PachecoT. C. K. F.
   Evaluation methodology for obtaining geotechnical parameters using electrical resistivity //First Break. – 2018. – Т. 36. – №. 8. – С. 55- 59.
   [Google Scholar]
8. MalehmirA. et al.
   Geophysical assessment and geotechnical investigation of quick-clay landslides– a Swedish case study //Near Surface Geophysics. – 2013. – Т. 11. – №. 3. – С. 341–350.
   [Google Scholar]
9. ShanC. et al.
   Integrated 2D modeling and interpretation of geophysical and geotechnical data to delineate quick clays at a landslide site in southwest Sweden //Geophysics. – 2014. – Т. 79. – №. 4. – С. EN61-EN75.
   [Google Scholar]
10. SolbergI. L. et al.
    Geophysical and geotechnical studies of geology and sediment properties at a quick-clay landslide site at Esp, Trondheim, Norway //Engineering Geology. – 2016. – Т. 208. – С. 214–230.
    [Google Scholar]
11. SulistijoB., AnwarA. S. K.
    Integrated site investigation method to analyze subsurface condition for the belt conveyor //Procedia Earth and Planetary Science. – 2013. – Т. 6. – С. 369–376.
    [Google Scholar]
12. GOST
    19912–2012. [2012] Grunty. Metody polevyh ispytanij staticheskim i dinamicheskim zondirovaniem. MNTKS.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Petrov, N. F., Pavlov, A. N., Nikonorova, I., YAkovlev, E., & Aleksandrov, A. [2012]. Opolzni na avtomobil'noj doroge M–7 «Volga» (Moskva-Kazan', 583–584 km) v pravoberezh'e R. Sura v Chuvashskoj Respublike. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya, (6), 625–625.
    [Google Scholar]
14. SP 11–105–97. [1997] «Inzhenerno-geologicheskie izyskaniya dlya stroitel'stva. CHast' I. «Obshchie pravila proizvodstva rabot». Gosstroj Rossii. Proizvodstvennyj i nauchno-issledovatel'skij institut po inzhenernym izyskaniyam v stroitel'stve (PNIIIS) Gosstroya Rossii.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Tarhov, A. G.
    (Ed.). [1980]. Elektrorazvedka: Spravochnik geofizika.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Dahlin, T., Schälin, D., & Tornborg, J.
    [2014]. Mapping of quick clay by ERT and CPT-R in the Göta Älv river valley. In Landslides in Sensitive Clays (pp. 217–228). Springer, Dordrecht.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Donohue, S., Long, M., O‐Connor, P., Eide Helle, T., Aspmo Pfaffhuber, A., & Rømoen, M. (2012). Multi‐method geophysical mapping of quick clay. Near Surface Geophysics, 10(3), 207–219.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Lavalle, L. V. A., Bortolozo, C. A., & Pacheco, T. C. K. F.
    [2018]. Evaluation methodology for obtaining geotechnical parameters using electrical resistivity. First Break, 36(8), 55–59.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Malehmir, A., Bastani, M., Krawczyk, C. M., Gurk, M., Ismail, N., Polom, U., & Persson, L. [2013]. Geophysical assessment and geotechnical investigation of quick-clay landslides–a Swedish case study. Near Surface Geophysics, 11(3), 341–350.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Shan, C., Bastani, M., Malehmir, A., Persson, L., & Engdahl, M. [2014]. Integrated 2D modeling and interpretation of geophysical and geotechnical data to delineate quick clays at a landslide site in southwest Sweden. Geophysics, 79(4), EN61-EN75.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Solberg, I. L., Long, M., Baranwal, V. C., Gylland, A. S., & Rønning, J. S. [2016]. Geophysical and geotechnical studies of geology and sediment properties at a quick-clay landslide site at Esp, Trondheim, Norway. Engineering Geology, 208, 214–230.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Sulistijo, B., & Anwar, A. K.
    [2013]. Integrated site investigation method to analyze subsurface condition for the belt conveyor. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science, 6, 369–376.
    [Google Scholar]