1887

Abstract

Summary

The use of multi-component seismic data has risen steadily since the ‘pure’ shear-wave acquisition activity onshore of the 1980s, through the converted-wave ‘revolution’ offshore in the 1990s and beyond. To benefit the most from multi-component seismic we hope for a situation where data quality of the entire elastic wavefield is similar which allows the complimentary information from compressional and shear waves to contribute together. Where either of these waves are compromised, the combined potential will necessarily be sub-optimal. To respond to Canada's Northern Alberta shallow unconventional reservoirs and provide high resolution imaging and characterisation, the industry has developed using point source and multi-component point receiver seismic. We describe the challenges addressed in processing for high resolution PP and PS imaging which deliver improved images and complimentary PP and PS attributes for characterisation. In this heavy oil unconventional reservoir setting, PS images are revealing new details about the geology not previously seen on P-wave data alone. The multi-component data have positively influenced an appraisal drilling program and subsequent pad layout, to take advantage of the geological variations and high grade the reservoir development plan.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901936
2019-06-03
2020-06-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Johnston, R., Linn, S., Baptiste, D. and Kjos, E.
    , [2005a], The Maturity of Ocean-Bottom Seismic – An Example from Trinidad, 67th Mtg. Eur. Assn. Geosci. Eng., Madrid Spain, P073.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Johnston, R., Bouska, J., Lyon, T. and Manley, D.
    , [2005b], Benefits of 3D4C surveys in the Caspian Sea, EAGE/SEG annual research workshop on “Multi-component seismic—past, present and future”, Pau France, proceedings.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Johnston, R.
    , [2009], Converted-wave imaging challenges, 79th Ann. Internat. Mtg. Soc. of Expl. Geophys., Post-convention workshop on Multi-Component Seismic, Houston TX, 4266–4270.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Manning, T., Brooks, C., Ourabah, A., Popham, M., Ablyazina, D., Zhuzhei, V., Holst, E., Goujon, N.
    , [2018], The case for a nimble node, towards a new land seismic receiver system with unlimited channels, 88th Ann. Internat. Mtg. Soc. of Expl. Geophys., Houston TX, 21–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Nahm, J.W., and Duhon, M.P.
    , [2003], Interpretation and practical applications of 4C-3D seismic data, East Cameron gas fields, Gulf of Mexico, The Leading Edge, 22(4), 300–309.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901936
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901936
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error