1887

Abstract

Summary

Travel-time tomography is a non-linear inverse problem. Monte Carlo methods are increasingly used to provide probabilistic solutions to tomographic problems, but these methods are computationally expensive. Neural networks can be used to solve some non-linear problems at a much lower computational cost. We show for the first time that a form of neural network called a mixture density network can perform fully non-linear, rapid and probabilistic tomographic inversion using travel-time data. We compare two methods to estimate the Bayesian posterior probability density functions: first a vector of networks are trained such that each estimates the marginal posterior probability distribution of wave speed in one grid cell; second, a single network estimates the entire posterior probability density function across all cells. While both methods provide estimates of the true structure in the means of their distributions, their uncertainty estimates differ: when separate networks are trained to solve for wave speeds at each location in the model the standard deviations exhibit uncertainty loops, as expected, whilst a network trained to solve for speeds on the whole model at once does not. The former method is therefore likely to be more robust.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901966
2019-06-03
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bishop, C.M.
    [1995] Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bodin, T. and Sambridge, M.
    [2009] Seismic tomography with the reversible jump algorithm. Geophys-ical Journal International, 178(3), 1411–1436.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. De Wit, R.W., Valentine, A.P. and Trampert, J.
    [2013] Bayesian inference of Earth's radial seismic structure from body-wave traveltimes using neural networks. Geophysical Journal International, 195(1), 408–422.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Devilee, R.J.R., Curtis, A. and Roy-Chowdhury, K.
    [1999] An efficient, probabilistic neural network approach to solving inverse problems: Inverting surface wave velocities for Eurasian crustal thickness. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 104(B12), 28841–28857.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Galetti, E., Curtis, A., Meles, G.A. and Baptie, B.
    [2015] Uncertainty loops in travel-time tomography from nonlinear wave physics. Physical Review Letters, 114(14), 148501.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Meier, U., Curtis, A. and Trampert, J.
    [2007a] Fully nonlinear inversion of fundamental mode surface waves for a global crustal model. Geophysical Research Letters, 34(16).
    [Google Scholar]
  7. [2007b] Global crustal thickness from neural network inversion of surface wave data. Geophysical Journal International, 169(2), 706–722.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Rawlinson, N., Pozgay, S. and Fishwick, S.
    [2010] Seismic tomography: a window into deep Earth. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 178(3–4), 101–135.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Shahraeeni, M.S. and Curtis, A.
    [2011] Fast probabilistic nonlinear petrophysical inversion. Geophysics, 76(2), E45–E58.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Walker, M. and Curtis, A.
    [2014] Varying prior information in Bayesian inversion. Inverse Problems, 30(6), 065002.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang, X., Curtis, A., Galetti, E. and de Ridder, S.
    [2018] 3-D Monte Carlo surface wave tomography. Geophysical Journal International, 215(3), 1644–1658.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901966
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901966
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error