1887

Abstract

Summary

We study a drilling situation based on real data, where the high-level problem concerns mud weight prediction and a decision about casing in a section of a well plan. Sensitivity analysis is done to select the most relevant input parameters for the mud weight window. In doing so, we study how the uncertainties in the inputs affects uncertainties in the mud weight window. Our approach for this is based on distance-based generalized sensitivity analysis, and we discover that the pore pressure and unconfined compressive strength are the most important input parameters. Building on this insight, a statistical model is fitted for the mud weight window and the two main input parameters, keeping in mind their geostatistical trends and dependencies. Finally we use the fitted model to the decision situation concerning casing, in a trade-off between drilling risks and costs. We conduct value of information analysis to determine the optimal data gathering scheme at a given depth, for making better decisions about casing or not. In spite of being case specific, we aim to develop a workflow that could be applied in other drilling contexts.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902182
2019-09-02
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Borge, H. [2000] Fault controlled pressure modelling in sedimentary basins. Ph.D. thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Eidsvik, J., Mukerji, T. and Bhattacharjya, D. [2015] Value of information in the earth sciences: Integrating spatial modeling and decision analysis.Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Fenwick, D., Scheidt, C. and Caers, J. [2014] Quantifying asymmetric parameter interactions in sensitivity analysis: application to reservoir modeling. Mathematical Geosciences, 46(4).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Nes, O.M., Boe, R., Sonstebo, E.F., Gran, K., Wold, S., Saasen, A., Fjogstad, A. [2012] Borehole Instability in Tertiary Shales in the Norwegian North Sea. In: SPE Deepwater Drilling and Completions Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Paglia, J., Eidsvik, J., Grøver, A. and Elisabet, Lothe A. [2019] Statistical modeling for real-time pore pressure prediction from predrill analysis and well logs. Geophysics, 84(2), ID1–ID12.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Park, J., Yang, G., Satija, A., Scheidt, C. and Caers, J. [2016] DGSA: A Matlab toolbox for distance-based generalized sensitivity analysis of geoscientific computer experiments. Computers & Geosciences, 97, 15–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Spear, R. and Hornberger, G. [1980] Eutrophication in Peel Inlet—II. Identification of critical uncertainties via generalized sensitivity analysis. Water Research, 14(1), 43–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Turley, J.A. [1976] A Risk Analysis of Transition Zone Drilling. In: SPE Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902182
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902182
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error