1887

Abstract

Summary

A geological model of a subsurface reservoir is unavoidably less complicated than the geological reality at depth. Two significant factors that contribute to this simplification are ambiguity of the seismic expression of faults and uncertainty caused by the presence of structural heterogeneities that are below the limit of seismic resolution. This is particularly important since fault systems are segmented, and fault architecture will vary with displacement. The fault ranking methodology described in this contribution is a useful way to help quantify interpretation uncertainty, and to identify which faults might need to be revised or might require mutiple realistic interpretations. The scaling relationships described in this work provide a means to estimate a realistic range of the dimensions of fault zone architectural elements, and therefore a way to calculate a realistic range of values for fault properties such as transmissibility.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902283
2019-09-08
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bond, C.E.
    [2015] Uncertainty in structural interpretation: Lessons to be learnt. Journal of Structural Geology, 74, 185–200.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bond, C.E., Gibbs, A.D., Shipton, Z.K. and Jones, S.
    [2007] ‘What do you think this is? “Conceptual uncertainty” In geoscience interpretation’. GSA Today, 17(11), 4–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Richards, F.L., Richardson, N.J., Bond, C.E. and Cowgill, M.
    [2015] ‘Interpretational variability of structural traps: implications for exploration risk and volume uncertainty’Special Publication - Geological Society of London, 421, 7–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Solum, J.G., Jolley, S.J., and Meyer, B.D.
    , [2016] Increasing Interpreter Capability in Structurally Complex Settings through Combined Fieldwork, Interpretation, and Geocellular Modeling. In: Krantz, R.W., Ormand, C. J., and Freeman, B. (Eds.) Earth, Mind, and Machine: 3D Structural Interpretation, American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir111, 191–218.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902283
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902283
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error