1887

Abstract

Summary

The reactivation of critically stressed faults during production-induced pressure changes bears a big risk and limits the total recoverable volume as for safety reasons pressure changes must be kept lower than potentially possible. Reservoir pressure and regional stresses can be reasonably well measured and estimated before the start of production. However, to maximize recovery while minimizing the risk of fault reactivation, assessing fault strength as accurately as possible is crucial. The strength of a fault depends on the mechanical properties of the fault rock (friction angle, cohesion), which can vary strongly over short distances, depending on displacement, complexity of fault geometries and available host rock lithologies. Especially clay minerals entrained in the fault core can tremendously reduce the strength of faults. We develop a workflow that uses standard fault seal algorithms (e.g. Shale Gouge Ratio) to estimate shale content in the fault rock and subsequently provide corresponding frictional properties for each fault cell in a reservoir model. This will be a function of the statistical distribution of shale smears in a fault depending on mechanical properties at time of faulting, as well as present day effective stress.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902295
2019-09-08
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Faerseth, R.B.
    [2006]. Shale smear along large faults: continuity of smear and the fault seal capacity. Journal of the Geological Society163, 741–751.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Foxford, K.A., Walsh, J.J., Watterson, J., Garden, I.R., Guscott, S.C., Burley, S.D.
    [1998]. Structure and content of the Moab Fault Zone, Utah, USA, and its implications for fault seal prediction. Geological Society, London, Special Publications147, 87–103.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Giger, S.B., Clennell, M.B., Çiftçi, N.B., Harbers, C., Clark, P., Ricchetti, M.
    [2013]. Fault transmissibility in clastic-argillaceous sequences controlled by clay smear evolution. AAPG Bulletin97, 705–731.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ikari, M.J., Saffer, D.M., Marone, C.
    [2009]. Frictional and hydrologic properties of clay-rich fault gouge. Journal of Geophysical Research114.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kettermann, M., Abe, S., Raith, A.F., de Jager, J., Urai, J.L.
    [2017a]. The effect of salt in dilatant faults on rates and magnitudes of induced seismicity – first results building on the geological setting of the Groningen Rotliegend reservoirs. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences96, s87–s104.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kettermann, M., Thronberens, S., Juarez, O., Urai, J.L., Ziegler, M., Asmus, S., Krüger, U.
    [2016]. Mechanisms of clay smear formation in unconsolidated sediments - insights from 3-D observations of excavated normal faults. Solid Earth7, 789–815.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kettermann, M., Urai, J.L., Vrolijk, P.J.
    [2017b]. Evolution of structure and permeability of normal faults with clay smear: Insights from water-saturated sandbox models and numerical simulations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth122, 29.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Navarro, M.
    [2002]. Fault Roughness and Fault Complexity: Field Study, Multi-Scale Analysis and Numerical Fault Model (PhD Thesis). Rheinische Friedrich-Willhelms-Universität BonnBonn.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Numelin, T., Marone, C., Kirby, E.
    [2007]. Frictional properties of natural fault gouge from a low-angle normal fault, Panamint Valley, California. Tectonics26, 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Saffer, D.M., Marone, C.
    [2003]. Comparison of smectite- and illite-rich gouge frictional properties: application to the updip limit of the seismogenic zone along subduction megathrusts. Earth and Planetary Science Letters215, 219–235.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Tembe, S., Lockner, D.A., Wong, T.-F.
    [2010]. Effect of clay content and mineralogy on frictional sliding behavior of simulated gouges: Binary and ternary mixtures of quartz, illite, and montmorillonite. Journal of Geophysical Research115.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Verberne, B.A., He, C., Spiers, C.J.
    [2010]. Frictional Properties of Sedimentary Rocks and Natural Fault Gouge from the Longmen Shan Fault Zone, Sichuan, China. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America100, 2767–2790.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Vrolijk, P.J., Urai, J.L., Kettermann, M.
    [2016]. Clay smear: Review of mechanisms and applications. Journal of Structural Geology86, 95–152.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Yielding, G.
    [2002]. Shale Gouge Ratio — calibration by geohistory, in: Koestler, A.G., Hunsdale, R. (Eds.), Hydrocarbon Seal Quantification, NPF Special Publication.Elsevier Science B.V.Amsterdam, pp. 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Yielding, G., Freeman, B., Needham, D.T.
    [1997]. Quantitative Fault Seal Prediction. AAPG Bulletin81, 897–917.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhang, L., He, C.
    [2013]. Frictional properties of natural gouges from Longmenshan fault zone ruptured during the Wenchuan Mw7.9 earthquake. Tectonophysics594, 149–164.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902295
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902295
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error