1887

Abstract

Summary

Pre-drill volume estimation in exploration involves a number of input parameters that carry a degree of uncertainty. The largest contributor to the pre-drill volume uncertainty is typically the hydrocarbon column height, which is controlled by both charge and seal behaviour. However, it is this parameter that E&P companies often find the hardest to predict, partly due to the lack of sufficient empirical data from existing fields and discoveries. A new empirical dataset has been compiled, which contains hydrocarbon column height, trap height, overburden thickness and trap fill percentage values for over 240 discoveries across the Norwegian Continental Shelf. The data has been aggregated into a probability tree to calculate the likelihood of a discovery containing different ranges of trap fill, depending on its burial depth and trap height. Results show that for a discovery with a given trap height, the probability of recording 100% fill increases when the overburden thickness increases. Equally, when the trap height increases for a given overburden thickness, the probability of discovery 100% trap fill decreases. These findings, amongst others strongly indicate the need to integrate trap height and overburden dimensions to assess suitable hydrocarbon column heights to use when estimating pre-drill volumes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902297
2019-09-08
2020-08-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Demirmen, F.
    [2007] Reserves estimation: the challenge for the industry. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 59(5), 80–89.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Doré, A.G. and Jensen, L.N.
    [1996] The impact of late Cenozoic uplift and erosion on hydrocarbon exploration: offshore Norway and some other uplifted basins. Global and Planetary Change, 12(1-4), 415–436.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Fosvold, L., Thomsen, M., Brown, M., Kullerud, L., Ofstad, K. and Heggland, K.
    [2000] Volumes before and after exploration drilling: results from the project: Evaluation of Norwegian Wildcat Wells (Article 2) In: Norwegian Petroleum Society Special Publications, 9, 33–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Graham, C.B., Savrda, A.M., Davis, S., Walker, P.E., Sykes, M.A. and Corona, F.V.
    [2015] Improving Hydrocarbon Column Height Estimates: Results From a Global Synthesis. In AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition, Article 90216 (Abstract).
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Niemann, J.C.
    [1998] Statistical Distributions of Hydrocarbon Column Heights for Gulf of Mexico Trap Types and Seals. Hedberg Research Conference, Integration of Geological Models for Understanding Risk in the Gulf of Mexico (Abstract)
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902297
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902297
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error