1887

Abstract

Summary

Faults play a key role in reservoir connectivity by enhancing or restricting fluid flow. While seismic data is one the main ways of subsurface investigation, faults are still interpreted as surfaces as their internal structure is often at the limit of seismic resolution. In order to populate reservoir models of fault volumes using fault facies techniques, we introduce an innovative seismic attribute analysis to characterise fault core and damage zone from undamaged surrounding rocks in siliclastic settings. We use a total horizontal derivative attribute in addition to the standard seismic attributes applied to fault analyses, and use statistical methods to establish the outer limits of the damage zone. We apply our workflow in porous silisclastic normal faulting in the Thebe Gas Field, Exmouth Plateau of the Canarvon basin, offshore Northwest Australia. Based on this analysis, we are able to define seismic facies calibrated with well and analogue data that can be used for spatial conditioning of fault-facies based reservoir modelling. Our work provide a visual and quantitative tool to define the internal structure of the fault damage zone in order to model fluid flow more accurately in reservoir grids.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902317
2019-09-08
2020-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Antonellini, M. & Aydin, A.
    [1994]. Effect of faulting on fluid flow in porous sandstones: petrophysical properties. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 78, 355–377.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Botter, C., Cardozo, N., Hardy, S., Lecomte, I. & Escalona, A.
    [2014]. From mechanical modeling to seismic imaging of faults: A synthetic workflow to study the impact of faults on seismic. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 57, 187–207.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Botter, C., Cardozo, N., Hardy, S., Lecomte, I., Paton, G. & Escalona, A.
    [2016]. Seismic characterisation of fault damage in 3D using mechanical and seismic modelling. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 77, 973–990.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Botter, C., Cardozo, N., Qu, D., Tveranger, J. & Kolyukhin, D.
    [2017]. Seismic characterization of fault facies models. Interpretation, 5, SP9–SP26, https://doi.org/10.1190/INT-2016-0226.1.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Champion, A.
    [2018] Seismic attributes for fault damage zone characterization and reservoir modelling, MSc Thesis, University of Leeds. 54 p.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cordell, L. & Grauch, V.J.S.
    [1985]. Mapping Basement Magnetization Zones from Aeromagnetic Data in the San Juan Basin, New Mexico. In: The Utility of Regional Gravity and Magnetic Anomaly Maps. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 181–197.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dutzer, J.-F., Basford, H. & Purves, S.
    [2010]. Investigating fault-sealing potential through fault relative seismic volume analysis. Petroleum Geology Conference series, 7, 509–515.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Faulkner, D.R., Jackson, C.A.L., Lunn, R.J., Schlische, R.W., Shipton, Z.K., Wibberley, C.A.J. & Withjack, M.O.
    [2010]. A review of recent developments concerning the structure, mechanics and fluid flow properties of fault zones. Journal of Structural Geology, 32, 1557–1575.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Iacopini, D., Butler, R.W.H., Purves, S., McArdle, N. & De Freslon, N.
    [2016]. Exploring the seismic expression of fault zones in 3D seismic volumes. Journal of Structural Geology, 89, 54–73, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2016.05.005.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kraus, K., Szafian, P. & Bell, R.
    [2018]. Quantitative Interpretation of Frequency Decomposition Blends Using Forward Modelling: Thebe Discovery, NW Australia, 80th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2018, Seismic Interpretation III – Resolution and Spectra, TH A11 11, 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Manzocchi, T., Childs, C. & Walsh, J.J.
    [2010]. Faults and fault properties in hydrocarbon flow models. Geofluids, 10, 94–113.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Qu, D. & Tveranger, J.
    2016. Incorporation of deformation band fault damage zones in reservoir models. AAPG Bulletin, 100, 423–443.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Schueller, S., Braathen, A., Fossen, H. & Tveranger, J.
    [2013]. Spatial distribution of deformation bands in damage zones of extensional faults in porous sandstones: Statistical analysis of field data. Journal of Structural Geology, 52, 148–162.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Torabi, A., Fossen, H. & Braathen, A.
    [2013]. Insight into petrophysical properties of deformed sandstone reservoirs. AAPG Bulletin, 97, 619–637.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Wibberley, C.A.J., Yielding, G. & Di Toro, G.
    [2008]. Recent advances in the understanding of fault zone internal structure: A review. In: Wibberley, C. A., Kurz, W., Imber, J., Holdsworth, R. & Collettini, C. (eds) (Eds) The Internal Structure of Fault Zones: Implications for Mechanical and Fluid-Flow Properties. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, v. 299, 5–33.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902317
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902317
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error