1887

Abstract

Summary

Permafrost demands for special requirements when designing infrastructure and for this, it often needs to be characterized in details. Ground-based Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) provides an indirect near-surface indication of permafrost down to a few tens of meters depth, when carefully calibrated by boreholes. While ERT is very successful for mapping the active layer (i.e., the layer which thaws and refreezes annually), further interpretation of resistivity profiles is impeded by the lack of resistivity contrast within the permafrost. Indeed, the lithological structures are hidden by the strong resistivity of the frozen layer. We present an example combining ERT with Induced Polarization (IP) surveying which allows to uncover the interface between the sediments and the bedrock. Although IP is rarely acquired on permafrost, the present case study shows the benefit of measuring it simultaneous to the ERT survey, at no extra costs or time consumption. The study is located near the cities of Longyearbyen and Barentsburg, on the island of Spitsbergen, Svalbard. Eight profiles were carried out in September 2018, when expected active layer thicknesses were at their maxima. Two-dimensional inversion was performed with the commercial software RES2DINV for the resistivity data and Ahrusinv for the chargeability data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902362
2019-09-08
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Banville, D.R., Fortier, R. and Dupuis, C.
    [2016] Objective interpretation of induced polarization tomography using a quantitative approach for the investigation of periglacial environments. J. of Applied Geoph., doi 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.04.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.04.019 [Google Scholar]
  2. Dahlin, T. and Leroux, V.
    [2012] Improvement in time-domain induced polarisation data quality with multi-electrode systems by separating current and potential cables. Near Surface Geoph. 10, 545–565.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Fiandaca, G., Ramm, J., Binley, A., Gazoty, A., Christiansen, A.V. and Auken, E.
    [2013] Resolving spectral information from time domain induced polarization data through 2-D inversion. Geoph. J. Intern., doi:10.1093/gji/ggs060.
    https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggs060 [Google Scholar]
  4. Fortier, R. and Allard, M.
    [1998] Induced polarization and resistivity logging in permafrost. Permafrost 7th Int. Conf., Collection Nordicana55.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. French, H.M.
    [2018]. The Periglacial Environment, Fourth Edition. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., Chichester, UK, 515pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hauck, C.
    [2013] New concepts in geophysical surveying and data interpretation for permafrost terrain. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, doi :10.1002/ppp.1774
    https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.1774 [Google Scholar]
  7. Hilbich, C., Hauck, C., Hoelzle, M., Scherler, M., Schudel, L., Völksch, I., Vonder, Mühll D. and Mäusbacher, R.
    [2008] Monitoring mountain permafrost evolution using electrical resistivity tomography: A 7-year study of seasonal, annual, and long-term variations at Schilthorn, Swiss Alps. J. of Geoph. Res., 10.1029/2007JF000799.
    https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JF000799 [Google Scholar]
  8. Kneisel, C. Hauck, C., Fortier, R. and Moorman, B.
    [2008] Advances in geophysical methods for permafrost investigation. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes19, 157–178.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Krautblatter, M., Verleysdonk, S., Flores-Orozco, A. and Kemna, A.
    [2010] Temperature-calibrated imaging of seasonal changes in permafrost rock walls by quantitative electrical resistivity tomography. J. of Geoph. Res., doi:10.1029/2008JF001209.
    https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JF001209 [Google Scholar]
  10. Liestøl, O.
    [1977] Pingos, springs and permafrost in Spitsbergen. Norsk Polarinstitutt Skrifter, 141.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. LokeM.H.
    [2019] RES2DINV version 6.1. Geoelectrical Imaging 2D and 3D. Instruction Manual. Geotomo Software, Available from: http://www.geotomosoft.com
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Marescot, L., Monnet, R. and Chapellier, D.
    [2008] Resistivity and induced polarization surveys for slope instability studies in the Swiss Alps. Engineering Geology, doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.01.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.01.010 [Google Scholar]
  13. Mollaret, C., Hilbich, C., Pellet, C., Flores-Orozco, A., Delaloye, R. and Hauck, C.
    [2018] Mountain permafrost degradation documented through a network of permanent electrical resistivity tomography sites, The Cryosphere Discuss., doi 10.5194/tc‑2018‑272.
    https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2018-272 [Google Scholar]
  14. Mudler, J., Hördt, A., Przyklenk, A., Fiandaca, G., Maurya, P.K. and Hauck, C.
    [2019] Two-dimensional Inversion of wideband spectral data from the Capacitively Coupled Resistivity method - First Applications in periglacial environments. The Cryosphere Discuss., doi:10.5194/tc‑2018‑288
    https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2018-288 [Google Scholar]
  15. Ollson, P.I, Dahlin, T., Fiandaca, G. and Auken, E.
    [2015] Measuring time-domain spectral induced polarization in the on-time: decreasing acquisition time and increasing signal-to-noise ratio. J. of Applied Geoph., doi 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2015.08.009.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2015.08.009 [Google Scholar]
  16. Romanovsky, V.E., Smith, S.L. and Christianse, H.H.
    [2010] Permafrost thermal state in the polar Northern Hemisphere during the international polar year 2007-2009: a synthesis. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, doi: 10.1002/ppp.689.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.689 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902362
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902362
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error