1887

Abstract

Summary

Geophysical techniques are well suited to provide additional data for the parametrization of groundwater models. Joint use of geophysical and hydrological information through coupled modelling and inversion relies in an appropriate transfer function, the petrophysical model. Due to uncertainties in the spatial distribution of petrophysical model parameters, constant distributions are often used as a simplifying assumption, even when heterogeneity is present in the subsurface. When using this simplification, discrepancies can arise in the computed geophysical response. In this work, we show how spatially variable properties and simultaneous petrophysical models can be utilized in a coupled hydrogeophysical modelling. The developed coupled modelling relies in the definition of adequate transfer functions between models (hydrological and geophysical), providing direct correspondence between the spatial distribution of the hydrogeological and electrical properties. It has been observed that the effects of lithological heterogeneity can have as much importance as fluid salinity variations only. Therefore, when assuming constant petrophysical parameterizations geophysical results might be interpreted incorrectly. The understanding of these effects is a necessary step for a correct application of the petrophysical model in hydrogeophysical studies and shows the importance of petrophysical parameter variability when using coupled modelling methodologies for accurate imaging and quantification of saltwater intrusion.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902437
2019-09-08
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Archie, G.E.
    [1942]. The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics, Transactions of the AIME, 146(01), 54–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Binley, A., Hubbard, S.S., Huisman, J. A., Revil, A., Robinson, D.A., Singha, K. and Slater, L.D.
    [2015]. The emergence of hydrogeophysics for improved understanding of subsurface processes over multiple scales. Water Resources Research, 51(6), 3837–3866.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brunetti, C. and Linde, N.
    [2018]. Impact of petrophysical uncertainty on Bayesian hydrogeophysical inversion and model selection. Advances in Water Resources, 111, 346–359.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cai, J., Wei, W., Hu, X. and Wood, D.A.
    [2017]. Electrical conductivity models in saturated porous media: A review. Earth-Science Reviews, 171, 419–433.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Comte, J.C., & Banton, O.
    [2007]. Cross-validation of geo-electrical and hydrogeological models to evaluate seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers. Geophysical Research Letters, 34(10).
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Comte, J.C., Wilson, C., Ofterdinger, U. and González-Quirós, A.
    [2017]. Effect of volcanic dykes on coastal groundwater flow and saltwater intrusion: A field-scale multiphysics approach and parameter evaluation. Water Resources Research, 53(3), 2171–2198.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Glover, P.
    [2009]. What is the cementation exponent? A new interpretation. The Leading Edge, 28(1), 82–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. González-Quirós, A., Comte, J.C., Rubio-Melendi, D. and Fernández-Álvarez, J-P.
    [2019]. Towards fully coupled finite element modelling of DC resistivity in complex seawater intrusion scenarios. 81st EAGE Conference & Exhibition 2019, London, Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Linde, N. and Doetsch, J.
    [2016]. Joint inversion in hydrogeophysics and near-surface geophysics. In: Integrated imaging of the Earth: Theory and applications, 218, p. 119.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Revil, A., Karaoulis, M., Johnson, T. and Kemna, A.
    [2012]. Some low-frequency electrical methods for subsurface characterization and monitoring in hydrogeology. Hydrogeology Journal, 20(4), 617–658.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Waxman, M.H. and Smits, L.J.M.
    [1968]. Electrical conductivities in oil-bearing shaly sands. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 8(02), 107–122.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902437
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902437
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error