1887

Abstract

Summary

Prestack Kirchhoff Time Migration (PSTM) is probably the most used method for obtaining proper image of complex subsurface. In areas of rapid lateral and vertical velocity changes, energy is dispersed in such a way that it is very complicated to be provide desired resolution of the data. The PSTM focuses scattered energy by moving it to a proper subsurface position if accurate velocity model is provided for migration. Only when energy is properly focused, stacking improves the quality of signals and eliminates noise. Building such velocity model, can bring significant improvement of seismic data quality (both resolution and continuity) and proper spatial structural positioning. For these reasons, velocity estimation process has great influence in seismic imaging. The process of moving seismic events to their actual location of occurrence in the subsurface is strongly dependant on the velocity model, but also is greatly affected of the whole processing quality. Seismic processing is long and comprehensive process of converting seismic field data into a meaningful seismic section and involves a lot of steps of data manipulations. The result is a high quality time image of the subsurface which better matches to the real geologic structures.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902625
2019-09-18
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Jones, I.
    [2010], An Introduction to Velocity Model Building. EAGE Publications, Houten, The Netherlands.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Grigorova, M.
    [2016], Structural changes in depth section as a result of velocity model incorrectness. International scientific conference “Geobalcanica 2016”, DOI: 10.18509/GBP.2016.26.
    https://doi.org/10.18509/GBP.2016.26 [Google Scholar]
  3. Al-Chalabi, M.
    [2014], Principles of seismic velocities and time-to-depth conversion. EAGE publications, Houten, The Netherlands.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. EsestimeP., BensonCh., CvetkovicM. and SpoorsS.
    [2016], Reducing the gap between seismic imaging and geology: Horizon consistent velocity analysis and modelling for pre-stack time and depth migrations. EAGE Publications, 34, 59–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ugwu, G.Z., C. C.Ezeh
    , C.C. [2012], Imaging complex structure in seismic reflection data using prestack depth migration: case study of Olua area of the Niger Delta, Nigeria. International Research Journal of Geology and Mining, 2(7), 199–204.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Schneider, W.A.
    [1978], Integral formulation for Migration in Two and Three Dimensions. Geophysics, 43, 49–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Claerbout, J. F.
    [1985], Imaging the earth’s interior: Blackwell Scientific Publications, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Stolt, R., Benson, A.
    [1986], Seismic migration: theory and practice, Geophysical Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Levin, F.K.
    [1971], Apparent Velocity from Dipping Interface Reflections, Geophysics36(3), DOI: 10.1190/1.1440188.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440188 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902625
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902625
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error