1887

Abstract

Summary

The present study investigates the seasonal dependence of the geomagnetic activity influence on the diurnal variability of the maximum electron concentration of the ionosphere over Bulgaria. Data from the ionosonde station Sofia for the period of 1995–2014 are used. The geomagnetic activity is described by the planetary Kp-index. The ionospheric response to the geomagnetic storms is studied by considering the deviation of the diurnal variability from its steady (median) course. It is found that the ionospheric reaction in summer is stronger than that in winter. Using the correlation analysis the seasonal dependence of the ionospheric response time delay for two ionospheric characteristics, foF2 and MUF3000, was determined. It is found that the time delay of the negative ionoispheric response in winter is longer than that in summer; an explanation of this result is offered.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902636
2019-09-18
2020-06-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Astafyeva, E., I.Zakharenkova, and M.Förster
    (2015) Ionospheric response to the 2015 St. Patrick’s Day storm: A global multi-instrumental overview, J. Geophys. Res. Space Physics, 120, 9023–9037, doi:10.1002/2015JA021629.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021629 [Google Scholar]
  2. Mukhtarov, P., and Bojilova, R.
    (2017) “Influence of solar and geomagnetic activity on the ionosphere over Bulgaria.” Comptes Rendus de L’Academie Bulgare des Sciences, 70(9), 1289–1296.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. RishbethH.
    (1991) F-region storms and thermospheric dynamics, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 43 (suppl.), 513–524.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. TanakaT.
    (1979) The worldwide distribution of positive ionospheric storms, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 41, 103–110.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. KelleyM. C., M. N.Vlasov, J. C.Foster, A. J.Coster
    (2004) A quantitative explanation for the phenomenon known as storm-enhanced density, Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L19809, doi:10.1029/2004GL020875.
    https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020875 [Google Scholar]
  6. BalanN., K.Shiokawa, Y.Otsuka, T.Kikuchi, D.Vijaya Lekshmi, S.Kawamura, M.Yamamoto, G. J.Bailey
    (2010) A physical mechanism of positive ionospheric storms at low latitudes and midlatitudes, J. Geophys. Res. 115, A02304, doi:10.1029/2009JA014515.
    https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014515 [Google Scholar]
  7. BlancM., A. D.Richmond
    (1980) The ionospheric disturbance dynamo, J. Geophys. Res., 85(A4), 1669–1699.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Muhtarov, P., Kutiev, I., & Cander, L.
    (2002) Geomagnetically correlated autoregression model for short-term prediction of ionospheric parameters. Inverse Problems, 18(1), 49.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Mukhtarov, P., Andonov, B., & Pancheva, D.
    (2013) Global empirical model of TEC response to geomagnetic activity. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 118(10), 6666–6685.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902636
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902636
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error