1887

Abstract

Summary

Ground Motion Prediction Equations-GMPEs define the values of a ground motion parameter as a function of earthquake size and the distance in terms of both expected values and their dispersion. GMPEs are essential in probabilistic seismic hazard studies, which are a key step for the evaluation of seismic risk and loss estimation for a region. In the present study, six attenuation relationships were selected for shallow and three for intermediate depth earthquakes on the base of general criteria. The Nakamura method was applied to classify the soil conditions of Bulgarian stations. The LLH and LH approaches were used for quantifying the goodness of fit of these relations to a large dataset of ground motion data from Balkan region.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902658
2019-09-18
2020-06-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abrahamson, N., W.Silva, R.Kamai
    , 2014. Summary of the ASK14 ground motion relation for active crustal regions. Earthquake Spectra, 30(3):1025–1055, doi: 10.1193/070913EQS198M
    https://doi.org/10.1193/070913EQS198M [Google Scholar]
  2. Abrahamson, N., N.Gregor, and K.Addo
    2016. BC Hydro Ground Motion Prediction Equations for Subduction Earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra: February 2016, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 23–44
    [Google Scholar]
  3. AkkarS., M. A.Sandikkaya, and J. J.Bommer
    , 2014a. Empirical ground-motion models for point- and extendedsource crustal earthquake scenarios in Europe and the Middle East. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 12 (1):359–387, 2014a. doi: 10.1007/s10518‑013‑9461‑4.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9461-4 [Google Scholar]
  4. , 2014b. Erratum to: Empirical ground-motion models for pointand extended-source crustal earthquake scenarios in Europe and the Middle East. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 12(1):389–390, 2014b. doi: 10.1007/s10518‑013‑9508‑6.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9508-6 [Google Scholar]
  5. BommerJ.J., DouglasJ., ScherbaumF., CottonF., BungumH. and FähD.
    (2010). On the selection of ground-motion prediction equations for seismic hazard analysis. Seismological Research Letters81(5), 794–801.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BooreD. M., J. P.Stewart, E.Seyhan, and G. M.Atkinson
    , 2014. NGA-West 2 equations for predicting PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA for shallow crustal earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra, 30(3):1057–1085, Aug 2014. doi: 10.1193/070113EQS184M.
    https://doi.org/10.1193/070113EQS184M [Google Scholar]
  7. CampbellK. W. and Y.Bozorgnia
    , 2014. NGA-West2 ground motion model for the average horizontal components of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped linear acceleration response spectra. Earthquake Spectra, 30(3):1087–1115, Aug 2014. doi: 10.1193/062913EQS175M.
    https://doi.org/10.1193/062913EQS175M [Google Scholar]
  8. CauzziC., E.Faccioli, M.Vanini, and A.Bianchini
    , 2015. Updated predictive equations for broadband (0:01_10 s) horizontal response spectra and peak ground motions, based on a global dataset of digital acceleration records. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 13(6):1587–1612, Jun 2015b. doi: 10.1007/s10518‑014‑9685‑y.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9685-y [Google Scholar]
  9. ChiouB. S. J. and R. R.Youngs
    , 2014. Update of the Chiou and Youngs NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra. Earthquake Spectra, 30(3): 1117–1153, Aug 2014. doi: 10.1193/072813EQS219M.
    https://doi.org/10.1193/072813EQS219M [Google Scholar]
  10. CottonF., ScherbaumF., BommerJ.J. and BungumH.
    (2006). Criteria for selecting and adjusting ground-motion models for specific target regions—Application to Central Europe and rock sites. Journal of Seismology v. 10, no. 2, 137–156.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Scherbaum, F., Cotton, F., and Smit, P.
    (2004) On the use of response spectral-reference data for the selection of ground-motion models for seismic hazard analysis: the case of rock motion. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 94, 341–348.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. ScherbaumF., E.Delavaud and C.Riggelsen
    , 2009. Model Selection in Seismic Hazard Analysis: An Information-Theoretic Perspective, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am, Vol. 99, No. 6, pp. 3234–3247.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. VacareanuR., M.Radulian, M.Iancovici, F.Pavel, and C.Neagu
    . 2015. Fore-arc and back-arc ground motion prediction model for Vrancea intermediate depth seismic source. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 19(3): 535–562.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. YoungsR. R., S.-J.Chiou, W. J.Silva, and J. R.Humphrey
    , 1997. Strong ground motion attenuation relationships for subduction zone earthquakes. Seismological Research Letters, 68(1):58–73
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902658
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902658
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error