1887

Abstract

Summary

The complexity and heterogeneity of the thin, tight Mauddud carbonate in the Greater Burgan Field makes it challenging to characterize and develop this formation. In the study reported here, we have taken advantage of substantial advances in production data analysis and oil fingerprinting technology to conduct a more advanced reservoir analysis.

The Mauddud carbonate reservoir is sandwiched between two massive clastic reservoirs, the Wara and the Burgan. The formation is mostly composed of calcarenitic limestone with intervals of 5–10 feet of good oil reservoir. Average porosity is 18% with low permeability ranging from 1 to 10 mD, characteristics which made this reservoir a candidate for horizontal drilling. However past production results have varied significantly among wells, a fact which previously raised the concern that perhaps the well paths of some lateral wells in this carbonate may be inadvertently tagging the adjacent, more permeable, clastic reservoirs. If that were the case, then production from the adjacent clastic reservoir could be augmenting the production from some of the wells intended to be completed solely in the carbonate. Considered in total, the results from previous development strategies for this reservoir did not meet expectations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201903126
2019-11-18
2020-01-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Edman, J. D., and M.K.Burk
    , 1999, Geochemistry in an integrated study of reservoir, compartmentalization at Ewing Bank 873, Offshore Gulf of Mexico: SPE Paper No.57470.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. England, W. A., A.H.Muggeridge, P.J.Clifford, and Z.Tang
    , 1995, Modelling density driven mixing rates in petroleum reservoirs on geological time-scales, with application to the detection of barriers in the Forties Filed (UKCS), in J.M.Cubbit, and W.A.England, eds. The Geochemistry of Reservoirs, Geological Society Special Publication No. 86. The Geological Society of London, U.K., p.185–201.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Halpern, H. I.
    , 1995, Development and Applications of Light-Hydrocarbon-Based Star, Diagrams: AAPG Bulletin, v. 79, p. 801–815.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hwang, R. J., AhmedA. S. and MoldowanJ. M.
    (1994). Oil composition variation and reservoir continuity: Unity Field, Sudan. Organic Geochemistry21(2), 171–188.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hwang, R. J. and BaskinD. K.
    (1994). Reservoir connectivity and oil homogeneity in a largescale reservoir. Middle East Petroleum Geoscience Geo942, 529–541.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hwang, R. J., D.K.Baskin, et al.
    (1999). Allocation of commingled pipeline oils to field production. Abstracts, 19th Internatisonal Meeting on Organic Geochemistry. Istanbul, Turkey, Tubitak Marmara Research Center Earth Sciences Research Institute. Vol. II: p. 602.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hwang, R. J., D.K.Baskin, and S.C.Teerman
    , 2000, Allocation of commingled pipeline oils to field production: Org. Geochem., v. 31, p. 1463–1474.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kaufman, R. L., A.S.Ahmed, and W.B.Hempkins
    , 1987, A new technique for the analysis of commingled oils and its application to production allocation calculations, paper IPA 87- 23/21: 16th Annual Indonesian Petro. Assoc., p. 247–268.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201903126
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201903126
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error