1887

Abstract

Summary

The adsorption of gas molecules (CO2, CH4, H2O, H2S and N2) on calcite (104) has been studied by means of Density Functional Theory, in order to investigate the molecular characterization of Enhanced Gas Recovery (EGR) processes by CO2 injection.

Results show that the geometries of both the surface and gas were not affected by the adsorption, highlighting the physisorption nature of the process. Water and hydrogen sulphide adsorb the strongest due to hydrogen bonding, while carbon dioxide follows next. Regarding the other gases, nitrogen adsorption is stronger in average when compared to methane, with a certain degree of complexity. In general, all the configurations’ energies can be found in a range of less than 0.4 eV for each adsorbate. Nevertheless, the larger affinity of CO2 in comparison with methane confirms the suitability of CO2 injection for methane release in EGR operations.

The stronger water adsorption compared to carbon dioxide (-0.91 eV versus -0.38 eV) gives a quantitative estimate of the impact of water as impurity. Further investigations need to address this issue, since this aspect could dramatically hinder the application of the whole technique. Coverage studies on methane and carbon dioxide further highlights the affinity of the latter to the carbonate surface.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201903135
2019-11-18
2020-07-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/monthly.html.
  2. Z.Dai
    et al., “An Integrated Framework for Optimizing CO2 Sequestration and Enhanced Oil Recovery,”Environmental Science & Technology Letters, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 49–54, 2014/01/14 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. A.Henni
    , “Carbon Capture: Harnessing Carbon Dioxide in the Middle East,” JPT, Journal of Petroleum Technology, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 66–70, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. M.Eliebid, M.Mahmoud, R.Shawabkeh, S.Elkatatny, and I. A.Hussein
    , “Effect of CO2 adsorption on enhanced natural gas recovery and sequestration in carbonate reservoirs,” Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, vol. 55, pp. 575–584, 2018/07/01/ 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. M.Eliebid
    et al., “Impact of Surfactant on the Retention of CO2 and Methane in Carbonate Reservoirs,”Energy & Fuels, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 5355–5363, 2018/04/19 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. P.Giannozzi et al.
    , “QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials,”Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, vol. 21, no. 39, p. 395502, 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. N. H.de Leeuw and S. C.Parker
    , “Surface Structure and Morphology of Calcium Carbonate Polymorphs Calcite, Aragonite, and Vaterite: An Atomistic Approach,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 102, no. 16, pp. 2914–2922, 1998/04/01 1998.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. G.Henkelman, A.Arnaldsson, and H.Jónsson
    , “A fast and robust algorithm for Bader decomposition of charge density,” Computational Materials Science, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 354–360, 2006/06/01/ 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201903135
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201903135
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error