1887

Abstract

Summary

Currently, in the practice of seismic studies there are trends leading to a revision of the existing system of quality control of the original seismograms:- implementation of high-performance full-azimuth 3D - systems of high density and multiplicity; - a radical increase in the number of receiving channels, the rejection of the grouping of receivers with a multiple decrease in the step between the receiving channels; - reduction of the absolute energy of a single impact with a compensatory increase in the number of impacts themselves; - relative reduction of the share of explosive seismic surveys in favor of surveys with vibration and pulse sources. The logic of the traditional approach is to select a signal against the background of noise (random, regular) with acceptable nonlinear distortions of the reflected wave spectrum. The logic of the new approach is to register the undistorted wave field of the signal and noise with the initial ratio of amplitudes, energy, spatial discreteness and multiplicity, providing the necessary quality of the useful signal in a wide frequency range at the processing stage. The substantiation of methodological parameters and criteria for assessing the quality of modern research is a non-trivial task, since it requires the preliminary identification of the most significant factors and the generalization of accumulated statistical data on the quality of the results obtained for specific conditions and traditional methodological schemes. The report presents some theoretical and empirical assumptions that allow using the idea of energy equivalence in the design of modern seismic studies

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201953032
2019-11-05
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Смирнов, В.Н. и Бондарев, Е.Б.
    [2017] Современное состояние, возможности и недостатки комплекса вибросейс NOMAD по сравнению с взрывным источником сейсмических колебаний в зимних условиях ЯНАО. Технологии сейсморазведки, 2, 108–122.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Шнеерсон, М.Б. и Жуков, А.П.
    [2013] Современные технологии возбуждения сейсмических волн. Приборы и системы разведочной геофизики, 3, 6–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. [2010] Современные тенденции вибрационной сейсморазведки. Приборы и системы разведочной геофизики, 3, 19–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Smirnov, V.N. and Bondarev, E.B.
    [2017] Current state, strengths and weaknesses of vibraseis nomad vs explosive sources on the example of YNAO’s winter. Tekhnologii Seismorazvedki, 2, 108–122.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Shneerson, M.B. and Zhukov, A.P.
    [2013] Modern technologies of seismic wave excitation. Pribory i Sistemy Razvedochnoi Geofiziki, 3, 6–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. [2010] Current trends in vibration seismic exploration. Pribory i Sistemy Razvedochnoi Geofiziki, 3, 19–25.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201953032
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201953032
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error