1887

Abstract

Summary

Almost all forms of full waveform inversion use a source wavelet estimate: this wavelet can be extracted from recorded data during the pre-processing or sometimes a zero-phase band-limited synthetic wavelet can be used instead. Alternatively, the source information can be regarded as another unknown in the inverse problem and be updated within the inversion procedure itself.

The importance of reliable source wavelet information during the waveform inversion implementation has been widely implied or briefly mentioned by multiple authors, but little detailed study of the effects of poor wavelets has been presented in the literature.

It is the purpose of this study to examine if shape errors in the source wavelet manifest themselves in a significantly damaging way in the velocity model obtained using conventional time-domain acoustic waveform inversion, and if so by what magnitude.

In addition, although it is clear that a suboptimal source wavelet will degrade the velocity model, we will also assess what effect such degradation has on migrated image positions, and compare this depth error to the inherent uncertainty expected in seismic images. In other words, we will try to assess how much wavelet error is acceptable before the image is distorted beyond typically accepted positioning errors.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202010031
2020-12-08
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Billette, F.J. and Brandsberg-Dahl, S.
    [2005]. The 2004 BP Velocity Benchmark.EAGE 67th Conference & Exhibition. p.B035.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Jones, I.F.
    [2018]. Velocities, Imaging and Waveform Inversion (The evolution of characterising the Earth’s subsurface). Houten, The Netherlands: EAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Lailly, P.
    , [1983]. The seismic inverse problem as a sequence of before stack migrations: Conference on inverse scattering: Theory and application, SIAM, 206–220.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Pratt, R.G.
    [1999]. Seismic waveform inversion in the frequency domain, Part 1: Theory and verification in a physical scale model.GEOPHYSICS. 64 (3),pp.888–901.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Rickett, J.
    [2013]. The variable projection method for waveform inversion with an unknown source function.Geophysical Prospecting. 61 (4),pp.874–881.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Singh, J., Braidwood, L., Valler, V., Michot, O., Wang, C., Jones, I.F., Bekkeheien, R.
    [2020]. Waveform inversion methodology for deep structural imaging in offshore Norway. Proceedings of the NPF biennial conference, Norway.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Sun, D., Jiao, K., Cheng, X., Vigh, D. and Coates, R.
    [2014]. Source wavelet estimation in full waveform inversionSEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2014. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp. 1184–1188.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Tarantola, A.
    [1984]. Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation.GEOPHYSICS. 49 (8),pp.1259–1266.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Virieux, J. and Operto, S.
    [2009]. An overview of full-waveform inversion in exploration geophysics.GEOPHYSICS. 74 (6),pp.WCC1–WCC26.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Vlassopoulou, A., Felicio, R., Hagen, C., Jones, I., Ackers, M. and Schjelderup, S.
    [2019]. Bayesian uncertainty estimation in the presence of tomographic model error.Second EAGE/PESGB Workshop on Velocities. pp.1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang, C., Yingst, D., Farmer, P., Jones, I., Martin, G. and Leveille, J.
    [2017]. Reconstructed full-waveform inversion with the extended source.SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp. 1449–1453.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Warner, M. and Guasch, L.
    [2016]. Adaptive waveform inversion: Theory.GEOPHYSICS. 81 (6), pp.R429–R445.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202010031
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202010031
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error