1887

Abstract

Summary

Full-waveform inversion (FWI) is a wave-equation-based inversion method to estimate the physical parameters of the geological structures by exploiting full-information of the seismograms. However, FWI is inherently an ill-posed problem that is sensitive to noise, especially to outliers in the dataset. Usually, this technique is formulated as a least-squares optimization problem that consists of to minimize the difference between the observed and the modelled seismic data (residuals). In this approach, the least-squares solution inversion problem determines the maximum likelihood for the residuals, where all residuals are assumed to follow a Gaussian distribution. However, the distribution of residuals is seldom Gaussian for non-linear problems. In this study, we propose an alternative objective function to mitigate FWI sensitivity to noise based on the q-Gaussian probability distribution. In contrast to Gaussian distribution, the q-Gaussian distribution has long-tails, being less sensitive to outliers. Application on acoustic synthetic noisy-data illustrates the performance between our proposal and FWI based on least-squares norm L2. In addition, we compare also with robust objective functions based on Huber criterion and least-absolute-values norm L1. Numerical experiments show that FWI based on the q-Gaussian probability distribution outperforms other approaches, especially in presence of outliers.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202010536
2020-12-08
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Brossier, R., Operto, S. and Virieux, J.
    [2010] Which data residual norm for robust elastic frequency-domain full waveform inversion?Geophysics, 75(3), R37–R46.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Elboth, T., Reif, B.A. and Øyvind, Andreassen
    [2009] Flow and swell noise in marine seismic data.Geophysics, 74(2), Q17–Q25.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Guitton, A. and Symes, W.W.
    [2003] Robust inversion of seismic data using the Huber norm.Geophysics, 68(4), 1310–1319.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Nocedal, J. and Wright, S.J.
    [2006] Numerical Optimization. Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edn.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Plessix, R.E.
    [2006] A review of the adjoint-state method for computing the gradient of a functional with geophysical applications.Geophysical Journal International, 167(2), 495–503.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Prato, D. and Tsallis, C.
    [1999] Nonextensive foundation of Levy distributions.Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics, 60, 2398–401.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Sato, A.H.
    [2010] q-Gaussian distributions and multiplicative stochastic processes for analysis of multiple financial time series.Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 201, 012008.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. da Silva, S.L.E.F., da Costa, C.A.N., Carvalho, P.T.C., de Araújo, J.M., dos Santos Lucena, L. and Corso, G.
    [2020] Robust full-waveform inversion using q-statistics.Physica A, Under Review.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Tarantola, A.
    [2005] Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Estimation. SIAM.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Tsallis, C.
    [1988] Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics.Journal of Statistical Physics, 52(1), 479–487.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Virieux, J. and Operto, S.
    [2009] An overview of full-waveform inversion in exploration geophysics.Geophysics, 74, WCC1–WCC26.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202010536
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202010536
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error