Assessment of PM-Caes Using a Coupled Power-Plant & Geostorage Model with Simplfied Reservoir Simulations

References

1. Barker, J.W. and Thibeau, S.
   [1997] A critical review of the use of pseudorelative permeabilities for upscaling. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 12, 138–143.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bear, J.
   [1972] Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media, Dover Publications, Mineola, NY, USA.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Christie, M.A.
   [2001] Flow in porous media - scale up of multiphase flow. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, 6, 236–241.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Durlofsky, L.J.
   [2005] Upscaling and gridding of fine scale geological models for flow simulation. Proceedings of the 8th International Forum on Reservoir Simulation, Stresa, Italy.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Heide, D., Greiner, M., von Bremsen, L. and Hoffmann, C.
   [2011] Reduced storage and balancing needs in a fully renewable European power system with excess wind and solar generation. Renewable Energy, 36, 2515–2523.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Hilpert, S., Kaldemeyer, C., Krien, U., Günther, S., Wingenbach, C. and Plessmann, G.
   [2018] The Open Energy Modelling Framework (oemof) - a new approach to facilitate open science in energy system modelling. Energy Strategy Reviews, 22, 16–25.
   [Google Scholar]
7. IPCC
   IPCC [2014] Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Working Group III Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, New York, USA.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Mouli-Castillo, J., Wilkinson, M., Mignard, D., McDermott, C., Haszeldine, R.S. and Shiption, Z.K.
   [2019] Inter-seasonal compressed air energy storage using saline aquifers. Nature Energy, 4, 131–139.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Wang, B. and Bauer, S.
   [2017] Compressed air energy storage in porous formations: a feasibility and deliverability study. Petroleum Geoscience, 23, 306–314.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Witte, F.
    [2019] Thermal Engineering Systems in Python, http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2555866, May 14th 2019.
    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2555866 [Google Scholar]
11. Pfeiffer, W.T., Beyer, C. and Bauer, S.
    [2017] Hydrogen storage in a heterogeneous sandstone formation: dimensioning and induced hydraulic effects. Petroleum Geoscience, 23, 315–326.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Pfeiffer, W.T. and Bauer, S.
    [2019] Comparing simulations of hydrogen storage in a sandstone formation using heterogeneous and homogenous flow property models. Petroleum Geoscience, 25, 325–336.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Pfeiffer, W.T., Witte, F., Tuschy, I. and Bauer, S.
    [2019] Test cases for a coupled power-plant and geostorage model to simulate compressed air energy storage in geological porous media. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Applied Energy, Extended Abstracts, 344.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Pickup, G.W. and Stephen, K.D.
    [2000] An assessment of steady-state scale-up for small-scale geological models. Petroleum Geoscience, 6, 203–210.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Renard, P. and de Marsily, G.
    [1997] Calculating equivalent permeability: a review. Advances in Water Resources, 20, 253–278.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Sainz-Garcia, A., Abarca, E., Rubi, V. and Grandia, F.
    [2017] Assessment of feasible strategies for seasonal underground hydrogen storage in a saline aquifer. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy42, 16657–16666.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Schlumberger NV
    Schlumberger NV [2018] ECLIPSE Version 2018.2 - Technical Description.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Sopher, D., Juhlin, C., Levendal, T., Erlström, M., Nilsson, K. and da Silva Soares, J.P.
    [2019] Evaluation of the subsurface compressed air energy storage (CAES) potential on Gotland, Sweden. Environmental Earth Science, 78, 197.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Steinke, F., Wolfrum, P. and Hoffmann, C.
    [2013] Grid vs. storage in a 100% renewable Europe. Renewable Energy, 50, 826–832.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Sternberg, A. and Bardow, A.
    [2015] Power-to-What? - Environmental assessment of energy storage systems. Energy & Environmental Sciences, 8, 389–400.
    [Google Scholar]