1887

Abstract

Summary

While deep geothermal energy is seen as a zero-emission renewable energy source, bulk of the geothermal energy plants do emit carbon dioxide (CO2) as part of the produced steam. In the current ACT Consortium funded project SUCCEED, researchers are investigating the potential for injecting produced and captured CO2 into the reservoir with the aim of enhancing geothermal production as well as permanently storing CO2 at the Kizildere (Turkey) and Hellisheidi (Iceland) geothermal fields. The re-injection of CO2 will be monitored at both sites using a novel seismic monitoring system. Prior to conducting active seismic surveys, we are performing a combined experimental and modelling study in order to: i) select the proper acquisition configuration for both sites, and ii) help the interpretation of field data to be recorded. This research presents a well-controlled laboratory study on the relationship between axial and radial stress and seismic velocities. Our first experimental results show that the rate of velocity increase, as function of increasing stress, is largest at low absolute stresses. This most probably reflects the closing of microcracks at low stress values, resulting in increased velocities. The results obtained in the laboratory, that reveal seismic velocities as function of stress (i.e. depth) for each of the different lithologies, are used as an input for modelling seismic reflections at Kizildere (Turkey) and Hellisheidi (Iceland). For both sites, we perform simulations where the source-receiver configurations and the type of pore-fluid (brine or CO2) are varied. Our first simulations show that changing the pore-fluid from brine to CO2 yields an overall lowering of the bulk density and seismic velocity of the reservoir, the latter resulting in an increased acoustic impedance contrast. The modelling results will be used for designing an optimal active seismic survey at both project sites for monitoring the CO2 injection.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202021053
2020-11-16
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Armannsson, H., Fridriksson, T. and Kristjansson, B.R.
    [2005] CO2 emissions from geothermal power plants and natural geothermal activity in Iceland.Geothermics, 34, 286–296.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Batchelor, T., Curtis, R., Ledingham, P. and Law, R.
    [2015] Country update for the United Kingdom.Proceedings World Geothermal Congress, Melbourne, Australia, April 12–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bertani, B.
    [2015] Geothermal Power Generation in the World 2010–2014 Update Report.Proceedings World Geothermal Congress, Melbourne, Australia, April 12–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cheng, F., Draganov, D., Xia, J., Hua, Y. and Liu, J.
    [2018] Q-factor estimation using seismic interferometry applied to vertical-well data.Journal of Applied Geophysics, 159, 16–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Curtis, R., Ledingham, P., Law, R. and Bennett, T.
    [2013] Geothermal energy use, country update for United Kingdom.Proceedings of European Geothermal Congress,The Hague, The Netherlands, June 11–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. ESMAP
    ESMAP, [2016] Greenhouse gases from geothermal power production. ESMAP Technical Report 09/16.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gassmann, F.
    [1951] Elastic waves through a packing of spheres.Geophysics, 16(4), 673–685.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hoek, E. and Franklin, J.
    [1968] Simple triaxial cell for field or laboratory testing of rock.Transactions of the Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, 77, A22–A26.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kaygusuz, K., Guney, M. and Kaygusuz, O.
    [2019] Renewable energy for rural development in Turkey.Journal of Engineering Research and Applied Science, 8(1), 1109–1118.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Sanner, B.
    [2019] Summary of EGC 2019 country update reports on geothermal energy in europe.Proceedings of the European Geothermal Congress, The Hague, The Netherlands, June 11–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Snæbjörnsdóttir, S.Ó., Eric, H., Oelkers, E.H., Mesfin, K., Aradóttir, E.S., Dideriksen, K., Gunnarsson, I., Gunnlaugsson, E., Matter, J.M., Stute, M. and Gislason, S.R.
    [2017] The chemistry and saturation states of subsurface fluids during the in-situ mineralisation of CO2 and H2S at the CarbFix site in SW-Iceland.International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 58, 87–102.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Snæbjörnsdóttir, S.Ó., Tómasdóttir, S., Sigfusson, B., Aradóttir, E.S., Gunnarsson, G., Niemi, A., Bas irat, F., Dessirier, B., Gislason, S.R., Oelkers, E.H. and Franzson, H.
    [2018] The geology and hydrolo gy of the CarbFix2 site in SW‐Iceland.Energy Procedia, 146, 146–157.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Thorbecke, J.W. and Draganov, D.
    [2011] Finite-difference modeling experiments for seismic interferometry.Geophysics, 76(6), H1–H18.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202021053
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202021053
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error