1887

Abstract

Summary

Hydraulic fracturing in tight gas reservoirs increases the connectivity of the well to further areal regions, thus boosting the production as well as the net-present-value of the asset. This type of reservoir typically exhibits considerable uncertainty in rock and fracture properties, which coupled with significant heterogeneity makes history matching, uncertainty quantification, and optimisation time-consuming tasks. Therefore, engineers are always looking for processes to reduce simulation time. Artificial intelligence enables machine-learning to learn from data. This allows for time-consuming fluid flow equations to be explicitly formulated while keeping the accuracy found through the implicit approach. This is achieved through the use of deep learning. In this research, a fully standalone simulator is developed for a range of hydraulically fractured tight gas reservoirs in a 2-dimensional space. Considering the low value of metrics (RMSE<65 psi, MAPE < 0.99%, and R2 ≈ 1) for training, validation and test sets, the results confirmed that the developed model, Deep Net Simulator (DNS), is accurate and reliable when compared with numerical models. Furthermore, DNS shows remarkable reliability when comparing the results of 140 unseen complete reservoir models over a 4-year period against a numerical simulator. The average value of MAPE for all 140 cases is 10.55%.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202032052
2020-11-30
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Artus, V., Tauzin, E., & Houzé, O.
    (2014). Efficient Proxies for Numerical Simulation of Unconventional Resources. In SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference (pp. 16). Denver, Colorado, USA: Unconventional Resources Technology Conference.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ghassemzadeh, S., Perdomo, M. G., & Haghigh, M.
    (2019). Application of Deep Learning in Reservoir Simulation. In Petroleum Geostatistics 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Knudsen, B. R., & Foss, B.
    (2015). Designing shale-well proxy models for field development and production optimization problems. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 27, 504–514.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Law, B. E., & Curtis, J. B.
    (2002). Introduction to unconventional petroleum systems. AAPG Bulletin, 86, 1851–1852.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang, S., Sobecki, N., Ding, D., Wu, Y.-S., & Zhu, L.
    (2019). Accelerated Compositional Simulation of Tight Oil and Shale Gas Reservoirs Using Proxy Flash Calculation. In SPE Reservoir Simulation Conference (pp. 19). Galveston, Texas, USA: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202032052
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202032052
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error