1887

Abstract

Summary

This study addresses strategies to efficiently impose nonlinear state constraints using reduced order models. Nonlinear constraints imposed on state variables are of practical interest in optimizing reservoir production performance (NPV or oil production), but they are difficult to handle numerically. Constraints involve bounds on control themselves (e.g. rates, BHP or valve openings), linear functions involving the design variables, but oftentimes nonlinear constraints involving state variables must also be imposed. Examples are minimum (maximum) BHP’s at producer (injector) wells subject to rate controls, or vice versa. Enforcement of these constraints involves repeated computation of state variables, and possibly their derivatives, not only at the ends of control steps but at numerous intermediate times. Both computations are time consuming and, thus, it is proposed to make use of reduced order methods to decrease the numerical effort. The contributions of this paper are twofold: (1) we propose correction points based on a time series within the control cycle to impose state constraints thus reducing the computational effort; (2) we are coupling the optimizer with physics-based and data-driven reduced-order models to enforce state complexity reduction.

Here, two strategies are compared: Proper Orthogonal Decomposition / Trajectory Piecewise Linearization (POD/TPWL) and Dynamic Mode Decomposition (DMD). Both methods are snapshot-based linearizations but are implemented differently. TPWL/POD technique reduces the complexity of the problem by linearizing the governing equations around converged and stored states during a training simulation, and reduction is obtained by projecting states onto smaller subspaces by POD. This method requires access to the simulator code and, thus, is an intrusive method. DMD also rely on state snapshots that are used to generate a small set of optimal basis vectors called modes. The snapshot data also permits extraction of a coherent dynamic structure of the problem through the assumption that there exists a linear mapping connecting temporal evolution of the state system. This evolution can be computed without further simulation runs. DMD does not require access to the simulator code and therefore is nonintrusive. The reduced-order techniques are compared in the optimization of a BHP controlled synthetic reservoir where the objective function is maximization of oil production subject to field water production rate constraints. We will demonstrate the handling of non-linear constraints and the resulting computational savings using the MATLAB Reservoir Simulation Toolbox (MRST). We performed modifications to some of its routines to store Jacobian matrices and also snapshots, both used at POD/TPWL and DMD.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202035070
2020-09-14
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Benner, P.; Himpe, C. & Mitchell, T.
    On reduced input-output dynamic mode decomposition. Advances in Computational Mathematics, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2018, 44, 1751–1768
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Biegler, L.
    Nonlinear Programming: Concepts, Algorithms, and Applications to Chemical Processes. Philadelphia: SIAM - Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cardoso, M. A.
    Development and Application of Reduced-Order Modeling Procedures for Reservoir Simulation, 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Carlberg, K., Bou-Mosleh, C., & Farhat. A. C.
    Effcient nonlinear model reduction via a leastsquares Petrov-Galerkin projection and compressive tensor approximations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ertekin, T., Abou-Kassem, J. H., & King, G. R.
    Basic Applied Reservoir Simulation. Society of Petroleum Engineering - SPE, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Fragoso, M.
    Aplicações de um Modelo Substituto de Ordem Reduzida a Estudos de Gerenciamento de Reservatórios, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gildin, E., Ghasemi, M., Protasov, A., & Efendiev, Y.
    Nonlinear complexity reduction. In SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. He, J.
    Enhanced linearized reduced-order models for subsurface flow simulation. Master’s thesis, Stanford University, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. He, J., & Durlofsky, A. L.
    Reduced-order modelling for compositional simulation using trajectory piecewise linearization. In Reservoir Simulation Symposium, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. K.-A.Lie
    . An Introduction to Reservoir Simulation Using MATLAB/GNU Octave: User Guide to the MATLAB Reservoir Simulation Toolbox (MRST), Cambridge University Press, 2019, ISBN 9781108492430.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Peaceman, D. W.
    Interpretation of well-block pressures in numerical reservoir simulation with nonsquare grid blocks and anisotropic permeability. SPE Journal, 1983.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Proctor, J. L.; Brunton, S. L. & Kutz, J. N.
    Dynamic Mode Decomposition with Control. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, Society for Industrial & Applied Mathematics (SIAM), 2016, 15, 142–161
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Rowley, C. W.; MeziĆ, I.; Bagheri, S.; Schlatter, P. & Henningson, D. S.
    Spectral analysis of nonlinear flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2009, 641, 11
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Schmid, P. J.
    Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental dataJournal of Fluid Mechanics, Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2010, 656, 5–28
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Tu, J. H.; Brunton, S. L.; Luchtenburg, D. M.; Rowley, C. W. & Kutz, J. N.
    On dynamic mode decomposition: Theory and applications. Journal of Computational Dynamics, American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS), 2014, 1, 391–421
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Zalavadia, H.; Sankaran, S.; Kara, M.; Sun, W. & Gildin, E.
    A Hybrid Modeling Approach to Production Control Optimization Using Dynamic Mode DecompositionSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2019
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202035070
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202035070
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error