1887
  1. Home
  2. Conferences
  3. Conference Proceedings
  4. ECMOR XVII
  5. Conference paper

Abstract

Summary

Numerical flow models based on Discrete Fracture Methods (DFM) represent a fractured porous rock using an unstructured mesh where fractures are a subset of the elements faces. This allows for a high degree of geometric accuracy, but it also raises numerical challenges: the mesh must honor both small and large scale geometric features while keeping tractable and stable computations. For these reasons, we previously proposed a new geometric approximation method, which can be applied before meshing.

The aim of this paper is to compare the flow impact of different geometric approximations of irregular and complex two-dimensional fracture networks. We present and validate a Control-Volume-Finite-Element DFM-based water flooding model and three fracture approximations strategies. The first strategy (A) projects fractures on the edges of an initial background mesh. The two others (B and C) rely on graph theory to analyze and modify a boundary representation of the fracture network according to minimal angles and mesh sizes criteria. Strategy B modifies the boundary representation using a contraction approach where flagged fracture elements (lines, extremities of intersections) are merged. Strategy C uses an expansion approach which moves the problematic fracture elements away one from another, hence preserving the model connectivity (we also present some adjustments as compared to the already published method). The approximation strategies A, B and C are applied to three reference data sets with respectively: two crossing fractures; highly connected fractures; anisotropic disconnected fractures. For each model, we compare the oil production and the saturation maps to the reference model. These tests show that the connectivity changes implied by the strategies A and B only have a small impact on the flow solution. Nonetheless, the expansion strategy C which preserves the fracture network topology provides the most accurate solution in all test cases.

© EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202035112
2020-09-14
2024-04-24

  • From This Site

    /content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202035112
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aarnes, J.E., Gimse, T. and Lie, K.A.
    [2007] An introduction to the numerics of flow in porous media using Matlab. In: Geometric modelling, numerical simulation, and optimization, Springer, 265–306.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Alghalandis, Y.F.
    [2017] ADFNE: Open Source Software for Discrete Fracture Network Engineering, Two and Three Dimensional Applications. Computers & Geosciences, 102, 1–11.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Anquez, P., Pellerin, J., Irakarama, M., Cupillard, P., Lévy, B. and Caumon, G.
    [2019] Automatic correction and simplification of geological maps and cross-sections for numerical simulations. Comptes Rendus - Geoscience, 351(1), 48–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bonneau, F., Caumon, G. and Renard, P.
    [2016] Impact of a Stochastic Sequential Initiation of Fractures on the Spatial Correlations and Connectivity of Discrete Fracture Networks. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 121(8), 5641–5658.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bonneau, F., Henrion, V., Caumon, G., Renard, P. and Sausse, J.
    [2013] A Methodology for Pseudo-Genetic Stochastic Modeling of Discrete Fracture Networks. Computers & Geosciences, 56, 12–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Dapogny, C., Dobrzynski, C. and Frey, P.
    [2014] Three-Dimensional Adaptive Domain Remeshing, Implicit Domain Meshing, and Applications to Free and Moving Boundary Problems. Journal of Computational Physics, 262, 358–378.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Davy, P., Le Goc, R. and Darcel, C.
    [2013] A Model of Fracture Nucleation, Growth and Arrest, and Consequences for Fracture Density and Scaling: A DISCRETE FRACTURE NETWORK MODEL. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 118(4), 1393–1407.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Davy, P., Le Goc, R., Darcel, C., Bour, O., de Dreuzy, J.R. and Munier, R.
    [2010] A Likely Universal Model of Fracture Scaling and Its Consequence for Crustal Hydromechanics. Journal of Geophysical Research, 115(B10).
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Fu, Y., Yang, Y.K., Deo, M.
    [2005] Three-dimensional, three-phase discrete-fracture reservoir simulator based on control volume finite element (CVFE) formulation. In: SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Geuzaine, C. and Remacle, J.F.
    [2009] Gmsh: A 3-D finite element mesh generator with built-in pre- and post-processing facilities. International journal for numerical methods in engineering, 79(11), 1309–1331.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Graf, T. and Therrien, R.
    [2008] A method to discretize non-planar fractures for 3D subsurface flow and transport simulations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 56(11), 2069–2090.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Gringarten, E.
    [1998] FRACNET: Stochastic Simulation of Fractures in Layered Systems. Computers & Geosciences, 24(8), 729–736.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Hoteit, H. and Firoozabadi, A.
    [2005] Multicomponent fluid flow by discontinuous Galerkin and mixed methods in unfractured and fractured media. Water Resources Research, 41(11).
     [Google Scholar]
  14. [2008] Numerical modeling of two-phase flow in heterogeneous permeable media with different capillarity pressures. Advances in Water Resources, 31(1), 56–73.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Jing, L.
    [2003] A review of techniques, advances and outstanding issues in numerical modelling for rock mechanics and rock engineering. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 40(3), 283–353.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Josnin, J.Y., Jourde, H., Fénart, P. and Bidaux, P.
    [2002] A Three-Dimensional Model to Simulate Joint Networks in Layered Rocks. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 39(10), 1443–1455.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Karimi-Fard, M. and Durlofsky, L.
    [2016] A General Gridding, Discretization, and Coarsening Methodology for Modeling Flow in Porous Formations with Discrete Geological Features. Advances in Water Resources, 96, 354–372.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Karimi-Fard, M., Firoozabadi, A.
    [2001] Numerical simulation of water injection in 2D fractured media using discrete-fracture model. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Long, J., Remer, J., Wilson, C. and Witherspoon, P.
    [1982] Porous media equivalents for networks of discontinuous fractures. Water Resources Research, 18(3), 645–658.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Manzocchi, T.
    [2002] The connectivity of two-dimensional networks of spatially correlated fractures. Water Resources Research, 38(9).
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Matthäi, S., Geiger, S., Roberts, S., Paluszny, A., Belayneh, M., Burri, A., Mezentsev, A., Lu, H., Coumou, D., Driesner, T.
    [2007] Numerical simulation of multi-phase fluid flow in structurally complex reservoirs. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 292(1), 405–429.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Monteagudo, J. and Firoozabadi, A.
    [2004] Control-volume method for numerical simulation of two-phase immiscible flow in two-and three-dimensional discrete-fractured media. Water resources research, 40(7).
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Mustapha, H. and Dimitrakopoulos, R.
    [2011] Discretizing two-dimensional complex fractured fields for incompressible two-phase flow. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 65(7), 764–780.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Mustapha, H., Dimitrakopoulos, R., Graf, T. and Firoozabadi, A.
    [2011] An efficient method for discretizing 3D fractured media for subsurface flow and transport simulations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 67(5), 651–670.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Noorishad, J. and Mehran, M.
    [1982] An upstream finite element method for solution of transient transport equation in fractured porous media. Water Resources Research, 18(3), 588–596.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Pellerin, J., Lévy, B., Caumon, G. and Botella, A.
    [2014] Automatic surface remeshing of 3D structural models at specified resolution: A method based on Voronoi diagrams. Computers & Geosciences, 62, 103–116.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Pichot, G., Erhel, J. and de Dreuzy, J.R.
    [2012] A Generalized Mixed Hybrid Mortar Method for Solving Flow in Stochastic Discrete Fracture Networks. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 34(1), B86–B105.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Sanderson, D.J. and Nixon, C.W.
    [2015] The use of topology in fracture network characterization. Journal of Structural Geology, 72, 55–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Xu, C. and Dowd, P.
    [2010] A New Computer Code for Discrete Fracture Network Modelling. Computers & Geosciences, 36(3), 292–301.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202035112
Loading
Comparing Three DFN Simplification Strategies for Two-Phase Flow Applications
Conference Proceedings 2020, 1 (2020); https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202035112
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202035112
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202035112
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error