1887

Abstract

Summary

Near well flow can have significant impact on the accuracy of the upscaling of geologic models. A recent benchmark study has shown that these errors may dominate over other aspects of upscaling in commercial reservoir simulators. This same study showed the advantage of "Diffuse Source" (DS) upscaling over previous approaches. We now demonstrate the application of the DS basis functions to the calculation of the upscaled well index and the well cell intercell transmissibility.

DS upscaling is an extension of pseudo-steady-state (PSS) flow-based upscaling that utilizes the diffusive time of flight to distinguish well-connected and weakly-connected sub-volumes. DS upscaling retains the localization advantage of a PSS calculation: unlike steady state flow, the local upscaling problem does not couple to adjacent regions and local-global iterations are not required. DS upscaling has been developed and utilized for the calculation of the intercell transmissibility, but we now apply it to calculation of the upscaled well index. Consistent with other researchers, we adjust the intercell transmissibility in the near well region.

We also consider the upscaling of the well index for a reservoir model in which the well trajectory and the high resolution geologic model are not simultaneously available. For many practitioners, this remains the most common reservoir modelling workflow. The result is an algebraic well index upscaling calculation, which also improves upon commercial applications.

The industry standard for the well index follows Peaceman. We show that PSS/DS upscaling reduces to Peaceman’s well index on a coarse grid, and is consistent with Peaceman’s numerical convergence analysis. (In contrast, steady state upscaling for the well index reduces to the Dietz well index.) The current approach is a generalization of Peaceman’s well index, but now extended to represent near well reservoir heterogeneity and with arbitrary placement of a well perforation within a simulation well cell.

Consistent with steady state upscaling, we find an advantage in adjusting the intercell transmissibility in the near well region. However, we have found that it is only necessary to do so for the well cell itself, which may be a consequence of the improved localization of the current calculation.

The new methodology performs very well. It is tested for several models, including the SPE10 reference model, the Amellago carbonate outcrop model, and the Equinor Volve full-field model. We compare the results to steady state flow-based upscaling, the algebraic well index upscaling described above, and to algorithms found in commercial applications.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202035156
2020-09-14
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Chawathe, A. and Taggart, I.
    2004. Insights into Upscaling Using 3D Streamlines. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering7 (04): 285–296. DOI: 10.2118/88846‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/88846-PA [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen, Y., Durlofsky, L.J., Gerritsen, M. et al
    . 2003. A Coupled Local-Global Upscaling Approach for Simulating Flow in Highly Heterogeneous Formations. Advances in Water Resources26 (10): 1041–1060. DOI: 10.1016/S0309‑1708(03)00101‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(03)00101-5 [Google Scholar]
  3. Christie, M.A.
    1996. Upscaling for Reservoir Simulation. Journal of Petroleum Technology. DOI: 10.2118/37324‑JPT
    https://doi.org/10.2118/37324-JPT [Google Scholar]
  4. Christie, M.A. and Blunt, M.J.
    2001. Tenth SPE Comparative Solution Project: A Comparison of Upscaling Techniques. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering. DOI: 10.2118/72469‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/72469-PA [Google Scholar]
  5. Desbarats, A.J.
    1992. Spatial Averaging of Hydraulic Conductivity in Three-Dimensional Heterogeneous Porous Media. Mathematical Geology24 (3): 249–267. DOI: 10.1007/bf00893749
    https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00893749 [Google Scholar]
  6. Dietz, D.N.
    1965. Determination of Average Reservoir Pressure from Build-up Surveys. Journal of Petroleum Technology17 (08): 955–959. DOI: 10.2118/1156‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/1156-PA [Google Scholar]
  7. Dijkstra, E.W.
    1959. A Note on Two Problems in Connexion with Graphs. Numerische Mathematik1 (1): 269–271. DOI: 10.1007/bf01386390
    https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01386390 [Google Scholar]
  8. Ding, D.
    2004. Near-Well Upscaling for Reservoir Simulations. Oil & Gas Science and Technology-revue De L Institut Francais Du Petrole - OIL GAS SCI TECHNOL59: 157–165. DOI: 10.2516/ogst:2004012
    https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst:2004012 [Google Scholar]
  9. Ding, D.Y.
    2010. Modeling Formation Damage for Flow Simulations at Reservoir Scale. SPE Journal15 (03): 737–750. DOI: 10.2118/121805‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/121805-PA [Google Scholar]
  10. Ding, Y.
    1995. Scaling-up in the Vicinity of Wells in Heterogeneous Field. Paper presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, San Antonio, Texas. 11. Society of Petroleum Engineers. DOI: 10.2118/29137‑MS.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/29137-MS [Google Scholar]
  11. Durlofsky, L.J., Milliken, W.J., and Bernath, A.
    2000. Scaleup in the near-Well Region. SPE Journal5 (01): 110–117. DOI: 10.2118/61855‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/61855-PA [Google Scholar]
  12. Fu, J., Axness, C.L., and Gomez-Hernandez, J.J.
    2011. Upscaling Transmissivity in the near-Well Region for Numerical Simulation: A Comparison on Uncertainty Propagation. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics5 (1): 49–66. DOI: 10.1080/19942060.2011.11015352
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2011.11015352 [Google Scholar]
  13. Geiger, S.
    2016. Amellago Carbonate Reservoir Model, Exxonmobil (Fc)2 Alliance. In. International Centre for Carbonate Reservoirs, Heriot-Watt University.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Guerillot, D.R. and Verdiere, S.
    1995. Different Pressure Grids for Reservoir Simulation in Heterogeneous Reservoirs. Paper presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, San Antonio, Texas. Society of Petroleum Engineers. DOI: 10.2118/29148‑MS.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/29148-MS [Google Scholar]
  15. Holden, L. and Nielsen, B.F.
    2000. Global Upscaling of Permeability in Heterogeneous Reservoirs; the Output Least Squares (Ols) Method. Transport in Porous Media40 (2): 115–143. DOI: 10.1023/a:1006657515753
    https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006657515753 [Google Scholar]
  16. Jayasinghe, S., Darmofal, D.L., Dow, E. et al
    . 2019. A Discretization-Independent Distributed Well Model. SPE Journal24 (06): 2946–2967. DOI: 10.2118/198898‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/198898-PA [Google Scholar]
  17. Karimi-Fard, M. and Durlofsky, L.
    2012. Accurate Resolution of near-Well Effects in Upscaled Models Using Flow-Based Unstructured Local Grid Refinement. SPE Journal17 (04): 1084–1095. DOI: 10.2118/141675‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/141675-PA [Google Scholar]
  18. King, M.J.
    2007. Upgridding and Upscaling: Current Trends and Future Directions. Society of Petroleum Engineers. DOI: 10.2118/112810‑DL.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/112810-DL
  19. King, M.J., MacDonald, D.G., Todd, S.P. et al
    . 1998. Application of Novel Upscaling Approaches to the Magnus and Andrew Reservoirs. Paper presented at the SPE European Petroleum Conference, The Hague, Netherlands. Society of Petroleum Engineers. DOI: 10.2118/50643‑MS.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/50643-MS [Google Scholar]
  20. King, M.J., Wang, Z., and Datta-Gupta, A.
    2016. Asymptotic Solutions of the Diffusivity Equation and Their Applications. Paper presented at the SPE Europec featured at 78th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna, Austria. Society of Petroleum Engineers. DOI: 10.2118/180149‑MS.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/180149-MS [Google Scholar]
  21. King, P.R.
    1989. The Use of Renormalization for Calculating Effective Permeability. Transport in Porous Media4 (1): 37–58. DOI: 10.1007/bf00134741
    https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00134741 [Google Scholar]
  22. Krogstad, S., Lie, K.-A., Møyner, O. et al
    . 2015. Mrst-Ad - an Open-Source Framework for Rapid Prototyping and Evaluation of Reservoir Simulation Problems. Paper presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Houston, Texas, USA. Society of Petroleum Engineers. DOI: 10.2118/173317‑MS.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/173317-MS [Google Scholar]
  23. Li, H., Chen, Y., Rojas, D. et al
    . 2014. Development and Application of near-Well Multiphase Upscaling for Forecasting of Heavy Oil Primary Production. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering113: 81–96. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2014.01.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2014.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  24. Li, H. and Durlofsky, L.J.
    2016. Upscaling for Compositional Reservoir Simulation. SPE Journal21 (03): 873–887. DOI: 10.2118/173212‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/173212-PA [Google Scholar]
  25. Lie, K.-A.
    2019. An Introduction to Reservoir Simulation Using Matlab/Gnu Octave: User Guide for the Matlab Reservoir Simulation Toolbox (Mrst). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Original edition. ISBN 9781108492430.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu, C.-H., Nunna, K., Syed, I. et al
    . 2019. Evaluation of Upscaling Approaches for the Amellago Carbonate Outcrop Model. Paper presented at the SPE Europec featured at 81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition, London, England, UK. 51. Society of Petroleum Engineers. DOI: 10.2118/195560‑MS.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/195560-MS [Google Scholar]
  27. Nakashima, T., Li, H., and Durlofsky, L.J.
    2012. Near-Well Upscaling for Three-Phase Flows. Computational Geosciences16 (1): 55–73. DOI: 10.1007/s10596‑011‑9252‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-011-9252-4 [Google Scholar]
  28. Nunna, K. and King, M.J.
    2017. Dynamic Downscaling and Upscaling in High Contrast Systems. Paper presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Conference, Montgomery, Texas, USA. Society of Petroleum Engineers. DOI: 10.2118/182689‑MS.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/182689-MS [Google Scholar]
  29. 2020. Dynamic Diffuse-Source Upscaling in High-Contrast Systems. SPE Journal25 (01): 347–368. DOI: 10.2118/182689‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/182689-PA [Google Scholar]
  30. Nunna, K., Liu, C.-H., and King, M.J.
    2019. Application of Diffuse Source Functions for Improved Flow Upscaling. Computational Geosciences. DOI: 10.1007/s10596‑019‑09868‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-019-09868-x [Google Scholar]
  31. Nunna, K., Zhou, P., and King, M.J.
    2015. Novel Diffuse Source Pressure Transient Upscaling. Paper presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Houston, Texas, USA. Society of Petroleum Engineers. DOI: 10.2118/173293‑MS.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/173293-MS [Google Scholar]
  32. Peaceman, D.W.
    1978. Interpretation of Well-Block Pressures in Numerical Reservoir Simulation (Includes Associated Paper 6988). SPE Journal. DOI: 10.2118/6893‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/6893-PA [Google Scholar]
  33. 1983. Interpretation of Well-Block Pressures in Numerical Reservoir Simulation with Nonsquare Grid Blocks and Anisotropic Permeability. SPE Journal. DOI: 10.2118/10528‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/10528-PA [Google Scholar]
  34. 1990a. Interpretation of Wellblock Pressures in Numerical Reservoir Simulation: Part 3 -- Off-Center and Multiple Wells within a Wellblock. SPE Reservoir Engineering5 (02): 227–232. DOI: 10.2118/16976‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/16976-PA [Google Scholar]
  35. 1990b. Recalculation of Dietz Shape Factor for Rectangles. 10. DOI: 10.2118/21256‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/21256-MS [Google Scholar]
  36. 1996. Calculation of Transmissibilities of Gridblocks Defined by Arbitrary Corner Point Geometry. 29. Society of Petroleum Engineers. DOI: 10.2118/37306‑MS.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/37306-MS [Google Scholar]
  37. Renard, P. and de Marsily, G.
    1997. Calculating Equivalent Permeability: A Review. Advances in Water Resources20 (5): 253–278. DOI: 10.1016/S0309‑1708(96)00050‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(96)00050-4 [Google Scholar]
  38. Schlumberger
    Schlumberger. 2017. ECLIPSE Version 2017.1 Reference Manual.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Shekhar, R., Sahni, I., Benson, G. et al
    . 2014. Modelling and Simulation of a Jurassic Carbonate Ramp Outcrop, Amellago, High Atlas Mountains, Morocco. Petroleum Geoscience20 (1): 109. DOI: 10.1144/petgeo2013‑010
    https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2013-010 [Google Scholar]
  40. Soeriawinata, T., Kasap, E., and Kelkar, M.
    1997. Permeability Upscaling for near-Wellbore Heterogeneities. SPE Formation Evaluation12 (04): 255–262. DOI: 10.2118/36518‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/36518-PA [Google Scholar]
  41. Vasco, D. and Datta-Gupta, A.
    1999. Asymptotic Solutions for Solute Transport: A Formalism for Tracer Tomography. Water Resources Research35 (1): 1–16. DOI: 10.1029/98WR02742
    https://doi.org/10.1029/98WR02742 [Google Scholar]
  42. Warren, J.E. and Price, H.S.
    1961. Flow in Heterogeneous Porous Media. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal1 (03): 153–169. DOI: 10.2118/1579‑G
    https://doi.org/10.2118/1579-G [Google Scholar]
  43. Wen, X.-H., Durlofsky, L.J., and Chen, Y.
    2006. Efficient 3D Implementation of Local-Global Upscaling for Reservoir Simulation. SPE Journal11 (04): 443–453. DOI: 10.2118/92965‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/92965-PA [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhou, Y. and King, M.J.
    2011. Improved Upscaling for Flow Simulation of Tight Gas Reservoir Models. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, USA. Society of Petroleum Engineers. DOI: 10.2118/147355‑MS.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/147355-MS [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202035156
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202035156
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error