Subsurface Pressure Regime Evaluation with 2D Basin Modeling: A Case Study of Two Subbasins from Hungary

References

1. Balázs, A., Burov, E., Matenco, L., Vogt, K., Francois, T. and Cloetingh, S.
   [2017] Symmetry during the syn- and post-rift evolution of extensional back-arc basins. Earth Planet Sci. Lett., 462, 86–98.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Hantschel, T. and Kauerauf, A. I.
   [2009]. Fundamentals of basin and petroleum system modeling, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Horváth, F., Bada, G., Szafián, P., Tari, G., Ádám, A. and Cloetingh, S.
   [2006] Formation and deformation of the Pannonian basin: Constraints from observational data. In: Gee, D.G., Stephenson, R.A. (Eds.), European Lithosphere Dynamics, Geol. Soc., London, Mem.32, 191–206.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Horváth, F. and Dövényi, P.
   [1988] Subsidence, thermal, and maturation history of the Great Hungarian plain. In: RoydenL, HorváthF (Eds.) The Pannonian Basin, a study in basin evolution, AAPG Memoir, vol 45, AAPG and The Hungarian Geological Society, 355–372.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Juhász, Gy.
   [1991] Lithostratigraphical and sedimentological framework of the Pannonian (s.l.) sedimentary sequence in the Hungarian Plain (Alföld), Eastern Hungary, Acta Geol. Hungarica, 34, 53–72.
   [Google Scholar]
6. McKenzie, D.
   [1978] Some remarks on the development of sedimentary basins. Earth Pl. Sci. Lett., 40, 25–32.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Magyar, I., Geary, D.H. and Müller, P.
   [1999] Paleogeographic evolution of the Late Miocene Lake Pannon in Central Europe. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol., 147, 151–167.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Nagy, Zs., Baracza, M.K. and Szabó, N.P.
   [2019] Integrated Pore Pressure Prediction with 3D Basin Modeling.Conference Proceedings, Second EAGE Workshop on Pore Pressure Prediction, Extended Abstract, Tu PP 04.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Prosser, S.
   [1993] Rift related depositional system and their seismic expression. Tec-tonics and Seismic Sequence Stratigraphy. In: Williams, G.D., Dobb, A. (Eds.), Geo. Soc. Spec. Publ., 71, 35–66.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Schaaf, A. and Bond, C.E.
    [2019] Quantification of uncertainty in 3-D seismic interpretation: implications for deterministic and stochastic geomodeling and machine learning. Solid Earth, 10, 1049–1061.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Schoellkopf, N. B.
    [2012] Quantitative assessment of hydrocarbon charge risk in new ventures exploration: Are we fooling ourselves? In: K. E.Peters, D. J.Curry, and M.Kacewicz, (Eds.) Basin Modeling: New Horizons in Research and Applications, AAPG Hedberg Series, 4, 237– 246.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Schneider, F., Potdevin, J. L., Wolf, S. and Faille, I.
    [1996] Mechanical and chemical compaction model for sedimentary basin simulators. Tectonophysics, 263, 307–313.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Spencer, C.W., Szalay, Á. and Tatár, É.
    [1994] Abnormal Pressure and Hydrocarbon migration in the Békés Basin. In: Teleki, et al. (Eds.) Basin Analysis in Petroleum Exploration. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordecht, 201–218.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Tóth, J. and Almási, I.
    [2001] Interpretation of observed fluid potential patterns in a deep sedimentary basin under tectonic compression: Hungarian Great Plain, Pannonian Basin. Geofluids1, 11–36.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Vakarcs, G.
    [1997] Sequence stratigraphy of the Cenozoic Pannonian Basin, Hungary, Thesis, Rice University.
    [Google Scholar]