1887

Abstract

Summary

The study of the relationship of seismicity with tectonic processes includes an analysis of the phenomena that precede or accompany earthquakes. At present, the direction “earthquake geology” is actively developing. The scientific and applied aspect of this direction is the study of tectonic movements that may occur in the future during such a period of time for which they are important for society. A significant amount of information on tectonic movements is provided by the focal mechanisms of seismic events that have already occurred, as well as the interpretation of the forms of the earth's surface. In his work, the author used seismic catalogs: NEIC (The National Earthquake Information Center) of the United States Geological Survey (The United States Geological Survey) and IRIS. Seismic events with M> 6 are involved in the analysis.A model of tectonic processes based on a detailed analysis of focal mechanisms of foci is proposed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202051023
2020-09-14
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. VernantPh. et al
    [2004]. Present-day crustal deformation and plate kinematics in the Middle East costrained by GPS measurement in Iran and northern Oman. Geophysical Journal International, 157, pp. 381–398.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ТрифоновВ.Г. ОбщиеТрифонов В.Г., КожуринА.И.
    Проблемы изучения активных разломов // Геотектоника. 2010. № 6. С. 79–98.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. ТрифоновВ.Г.
    Неотектоника подвижных поясов. Труды Геологического института, Москва, ГЕОС, 2017. — С.180
    [Google Scholar]
  4. В.Ю.Абрамов, Х.Алджабасини
    . Литологические особенности стратиграфии и тектонического районирования сейсмически активного Загросского краевого прогиба в пределах акватории Персидского залива. Вестник РУДН, серия: Инженерные исследования, 2019, Том 20 №1, С. 57–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. А.А.Лукк, Ю.Л.Ребецкий
    . Современная геодинамика и фокальные механизмы землетрясений в окрестностях Бушерской АЭС. Геофизические процессы и биосфера. 2018. Т. 17, №3. С. 90–108.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Г.Г.Кочарян
    . Геомеханика разломов. Российская академия наук; Институт динамики геосфер; Российский научный фонд. — М.: ГЕОС, 2016, 424 с.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Е.А.Рогожин
    . Сейсмотектонические особенности Ахрамского землетрясения 24 сентября 1999 года (Иран, Загрос). Геотектоника, 2012, №5, с. 63–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. ШеньТо
    . Сейсмическая активизация восточного Тибета в начале 21 века и сейсмотектоническая роль литосферного блока Баян-Хара. Диссертация на соискание степени кандидата к.г.-м.н. Москва — 2018, с. 167.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. AmbraseysN.N., MelvilleC.P
    [1982]. A history of Persian earthquakes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Berberian, M., and G. C. P.King
    [1981], Towards the paleogeography and tectonic evolution of Iran, Can. J. Earth Sci., 18, 210–265.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. DeweyJ.W., CrantzA
    [1973]. The Ghir earthquake of April 10, 1972 in the Zagros mountains of southern Iran: seismotectonic aspects and some results of field reconnaissance. Seismological Society of America Bulletin, 63, 2071.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. McEvillyT.V., RasaniR
    [1973]. A preliminary report: the Qir, Iran earthquake of April 10, 1972. Seismological Society of America Bulletin, 63, 339–354.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. MedvedevS.V., KarapetianB.K., ByhovskyV.A
    [1968]. Seismic influences on buildings and structures. Moscow, 190 pp. (in Russian).
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Mohajer-AshjaiA., NowrooziA.A
    [1983]. Reply to Berberian comments on the paper: Mohajer-AshjaiA., NowrooziA.A.The Tabas earthquake of September, 16, 1978 in East Central Iran. Geophys. Geophys. Research Letters, 10, 199–202
    [Google Scholar]
  15. MohajerG.A., Pierce R.G.Kazvin
    [1963], Iran earthquake. American Association of Petrol. Geol. Bulletin, 47, 1878–1883.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. M.Sepehr and J. W.Cosgrove
    [2005]. Role of the Kazerun in the formation and deformation of the Zagros Fold-Thrust Belt, Iran. TECTONICS, VOL. 24, TC5005, doi:10.1029/2004TC001725.
    https://doi.org/10.1029/2004TC001725 [Google Scholar]
  17. VernantPh. et al
    [2004]. Present-day crustal deformation and plate kinematics in the Middle East costrained by GPS measurement in Iran and northern Oman. Geophysical Journal International, 157, pp. 381–398.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. TrifonovV.G
    [2010]. General Trifonov V.G., Kozhurin A.I. Problems of studying active faults // Geotectonics. 2010. No. 6. P. 79–98.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. [2017]. Neotectonics of moving belts. Proceedings of the Geological Institute, Moscow, GEOS, 2017. — P.1807.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. V.Yu.Abramov, H.Aljabasini
    [2019]. Lithological features of stratigraphy and tectonic zoning of the seismically active Zagros marginal trough within the Persian Gulf. RUDN University Bulletin, a series: Engineering Research, 2019, Volume 20 No. 1, P. 57–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. A.A.Lucc, J.L.Rebetskiy
    [2018]. Modern geodynamics and focal mechanisms of earthquakes in the vicinity of the Bushehr nuclear power plant. Geophysical processes and biosphere. 2018. Vol. 17, No. 3. S. 90–108.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. G.G.Kocharyan
    [2016]. Fault geomechanics. The Russian Academy of Sciences; Institute of Dynamics of Geospheres; Russian Science Foundation. — M.: GEOS, 2016, 424 p.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. E.A.Rogozhin
    [2012]. Seismotectonic features of the Akhram earthquake on September 24, 1999 (Iran, Zagros). Geotectonics, 2012, No. 5, p. 63–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. ShenTho
    [2018]. Seismic activation of eastern Tibet at the beginning of the 21st century and the seismotectonic role of the Bayan-Khar lithosphere block. The dissertation for the degree of candidate of c. Moscow — 2018, p. 167.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. AmbraseysN.N., MelvilleC.P
    [1982]. A history of Persian earthquakes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Berberian, M., and G. C. P.King
    [1981], Towards the paleogeography and tectonic evolution of Iran, Can. J. Earth Sci., 18, 210–265.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. DeweyJ.W., CrantzA
    [1973]. The Ghir earthquake of April 10, 1972 in the Zagros mountains of southern Iran: seismotectonic aspects and some results of field reconnaissance. Seismological Society of America Bulletin, 63, 2071.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. McEvillyT.V., RasaniR
    [1973]. A preliminary report: the Qir, Iran earthquake of April 10, 1972. Seismological Society of America Bulletin, 63, 339–354.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. MedvedevS.V., KarapetianB.K., ByhovskyV.A
    [1968]. Seismic influences on buildings and structures. Moscow, 190 pp. (in Russian).
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Mohajer-AshjaiA., NowrooziA.A
    [1983]. Reply to Berberian comments on the paper: Mohajer-Ashjai A., Nowroozi A.A. The Tabas earthquake of September, 16, 1978 in East Central Iran. Geophys. Geophys. Research Letters, 10, 199–202
    [Google Scholar]
  31. MohajerG.A., Pierce R.G.Kazvin
    [1963], Iran earthquake. American Association of Petrol. Geol. Bulletin, 47, 1878–1883.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. M.Sepehr and J. W.Cosgrove
    [2005]. Role of the Kazerun in the formation and deformation of the Zagros Fold-Thrust Belt, Iran. TECTONICS, VOL. 24, TC5005, doi:10.1029/2004TC001725.
    https://doi.org/10.1029/2004TC001725 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202051023
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202051023
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error