Vector Acoustic Full Waveform Inversion: Connection to Inverse Wavefield Extrapolation and Implication for Image Resolution

References

1. Akrami, S., Zheglova, P. and Malcolm, A.
   [2017] An algorithm for vector data full-waveform inversion. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2017, 1568–1572.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Carlson, D., Long, A., W.Sôllner, Tabti, H., Tenghamn, R. and Lunde, N.
   [2007] Increased resolution and penetration from a towed dual-sensor streamer. First break, 25,71–77.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Fleury, C., and Vasconcelos, I.
   [2013] Adjoint-state reverse time migration of 4C data: Finite- frequency map migration for marine seismic image. Geophysical Journal International, 78, WA159–WA172.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Kohnke, C., and Sava, P.
   [2019], Inversion of vector-acoustic data in a local domain. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2019.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Martin, G. S., Marfurt, K. J. and Larsen, S.
   [2002] Marmousi-2: An updated model for the investigation of AVO in structurally complex areas. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2002, 1979–1982.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Nocedal, J. and Wright, S. J.
   [2006] Numerical optimization: Springer.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Ôzbek, A., Vassallo, M., Ôzdemir, K., van Manen, D.-J. and Eggenberger, K.
   [2010] Crossline wavefield reconstruction from multicomponent streamer data: Part 2 - joint interpolation and 3D up/down separation by generalized matching pursuit: Geophisics, 75, WB69–WB85.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Ravasi, M., Vasconcelos, I., Curtis, A. and Kritski, A.
   [2015] Vector-acoustic reverse time migration of Volve ocean-bottom cable data set without up/down decomposed wavefields. Geophysics, 80, S137–S150.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Reiser, C., Bird, T. L., Engelmark, F., Anderson, E. C., and Balabekov, Y.
   [2012] Value of broadband seismic for interpretation, reservoir characterization and quantitative interpretation workflows. First Break, 30, 67–75.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Robertsson, J.O.A., Moore, I., Vassallo, M., Ôzdemir, K., van Manen, D.-J. and Ôzbek, A.
    [2008] On the use of multicomponent streamer recordings for reconstruction of pressure wavefields in the crossline direction. Journal of Geophysical Research, 73, A45–A49.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Vassallo, M., Ôzbek, A., Ôzdemir, K. and Eggenberger, K.
    [2010] Crossline wavefield reconstruction from multicomponent streamer data: Part 1 - multichannel interpolation by matching pursuit (mimap) using pressure and its crossline gradient. Geophisics, 75, WB53–WB67.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Wapenaar, K.
    , [2007] General representations for wavefield modeling and inversion in geophysics. Geophisics, 72, SM5–SM17.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Zheglova, P., and Malcolm, A.
    [2019a] Taking advantage of receiver ghosts and pressure gradients in vector acoustic full waveform inversion. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Zheglova, P., and Malcolm, A.
    [2019b] Vector acoustic full waveform inversion: taking advantage of de-aliasing and receiver ghosts. https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.05427.
    https://doi.org/https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.05427 [Google Scholar]
15. Zhong, Y., and Liu, Y.
    [2019] Source-independent time-domain vector-acoustic full-waveform inversion. Geophysics, 84, R489–R505.
    [Google Scholar]