1887

Abstract

Summary

This article is aimed at analysis the applicability of machine learning (ML) algorithms in predicting discontinuous violations based on potential field data. The text discusses common methods for identifying discontinuous violations and alternative methods based on machine logic using data from potential fields and their transformants. The advantages and disadvantages of algorithms in comparison with classical methods for determining discontinuous structures are also described. Using the example of one of the license areas (the East Siberian sea), we present a solution to the problem of fault mapping using machine prediction using ML and the “Reana” anomaly axis selection algorithm. In conclusion, we describe the features of working with the methods of automatic prediction of discontinuous violations, the relevance of further development of the application of this direction. It is shown that the algorithm is efficient and suitable for practical use.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202054005
2020-10-19
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. 1.EgorovA. S.Deep structure and tectonic zonation of the consolidated crust of Russian Arctic. SAINT PETERSBURG 2018: INNOVATIONS IN GEOSCIENCES & TIME FOR BREAKTHROUGH
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2.IngerovI., MendriiI. and LozoviyA., Integrated Field Surveys with Complex of Electroprospecting Methods Using Broadband Multifunction EM Instruments. 24th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Sep2018, Volume 2018, p.1 – 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201802579
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 3.Putikov, O., Kholmymanski, M., Ivanov, G., Senchina, N.Application of geoelectrochemical method for exploration of petroleum fields on the Arctic shelf, 2019, Chemie der Erde. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoch.2019.02
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoch.2019.02 [Google Scholar]
  4. 4.RascheC.Rapid Contour Detection for Image Classification. November 2017 IET Image Processing 12(4). DOI: 10.1049/iet‑ipr.2017.1066
    https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-ipr.2017.1066 [Google Scholar]
  5. 5.SenchinaN. P., GrigorievG. S., GulinV. D.The Applicability of Multilevel Magnetometry for Reducing the Level of Geological Uncertainties in the Data Interpretation / International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, № 5, V 15, 2020. P. 492 – 497
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 1.EgorovA. S.Deep structure and tectonic zonation of the consolidated crust of Russian Arctic. SAINT PETERSBURG 2018: INNOVATIONS IN GEOSCIENCES & TIME FOR BREAKTHROUGH
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 2.Putikov, O., Kholmymanski, M., Ivanov, G., Senchina, N.Application of geoelectrochemical method for exploration of petroleum fields on the Arctic shelf, 2019, Chemie der Erde. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoch.2019.02.001.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoch.2019.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  8. 3.RascheC.Rapid Contour Detection for Image Classification. November 2017 IET Image Processing 12(4). DOI: 10.1049/iet‑ipr.2017.1066
    https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-ipr.2017.1066 [Google Scholar]
  9. 4.SenchinaN. P., GrigorievG. S., GulinV. D.The Applicability of Multilevel Magnetometry for Reducing the Level of Geological Uncertainties in the Data Interpretation / International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, № 5, V 15, 2020. P. 492 – 497.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202054005
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202054005
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error