1887
PDF

Abstract

Summary

The purpose of the study is to analyse the current state of air quality monitoring in Ukrainian cities, particularly in Kyiv, identify the critical problems in the state monitoring system and substantiate the criteria for optimal air quality monitoring station (AQMS) arrangement to achieve strategic city development goals. Presently, monitoring stations, as usually, are located close to sources of harmful atmospheric emission. This is not helpful in improving the representativeness of the results obtained. Critical social and environmental criteria, which are generally accepted worldwide, are not accounted for. We analysed the demographics statistics, data on atmospheric pollution levels in different Kyiv districts, and regulatory documents. We compared population density indicators with locations of existing monitoring networks where contaminated air has the most adverse impact on public health. The comparison also included the greenness level in all locations and found that the spatial air quality monitoring networks distribution fails to meet modern criteria. With account of absence of a single methodology for determining spatial AQMS representativeness, its chosen key criteria were as follows: average annual concentrations of main air pollutants, population density and urban green spaces distribution within city boundaries. These criteria and the results obtained allowed substantiating the scheme for optimal AQMS arrangement.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202056009
2020-11-10
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2020/monitoring-2020/Monitoring2020_9.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202056009&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ballesta, P. P., Field, R. A., Fernandez-Patier, R., Madruga, D. G., Connolly, R., Caracena, A. B., et al.
    [2008]. An approach for the evaluation of exposure patterns of urban populations to air pollution.Atmospheric Environment,42(21), 5350–5364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.02.047
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bilous, L., Shyshchenco, P., Samoilenko, V. and Havrylenko, O.
    [2020]. Spatial morphometric analysis of digital elevation model in landscape research. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.Conference – Proceedings, Geoinformatics: Theoretical and Applied Aspects 2020, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.2020geo124
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Castell, N., Dauge, F. R., Schneider, P., Vogt, M., Lerner, U., Fishbain, B., Broday, D. and Bartonova, A.
    [2017]. Can commercial low-cost sensor platforms contribute to air quality monitoring and exposure estimates?Environment International,99, 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.12.007
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Fowler, D., Pilegaard, K., Sutton, M. A., Ambus, P., Raivonen, M., Duyzer, J., et al.
    [2009]. Atmospheric composition change: Ecosystems-Atmosphere interactions.Atmospheric Environment,43(33), 5193–5267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.07.068
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Landrigan, P. J.
    [2017]. Air pollution and health.The Lancet Public Health,2(1), E4–E5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(16)30023-8
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Mihăiţă, A. S., Dupont, L., Chery, O., Camargo, M. and Cai, C.
    [2019]. Evaluating air quality by combining stationary, smart mobile pollution monitoring and data-driven modelling.Journal of Cleaner Production,221,398–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.179
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Munir, S., Mayfield, M., Coca, D. and Jubb, S. A.
    [2019]. Structuring an integrated air quality monitoring network in large urban areas – Discussing the purpose, criteria and deployment strategy.Atmospheric Environment.X, 2, 1000273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2019.100027
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Puliafito, S. E., Allende, D., Fernandez, R., Castro, F. and Cremades, P.
    [2011]. New Approaches for Urban and Regional Air Pollution Modelling and Management. Chapter in: F.Nejadkoorki (Ed.) Advanced Air Pollution. InTech, Rijeca, Croatia, 429–454. DOI: 10.5772/16673
    https://doi.org/10.5772/16673 [Google Scholar]
  9. Righini, G., Cappelletti, A., Ciucci, A., Cremona, G., Piersanti, A., Vitali, L. and Ciancarella, L.
    [2014]. GIS based assessment of the spatial representativeness of air quality monitoring stations using pollutant emissions data.Atmospheric Environment,97, 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.08.015
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Samoilenko, V. and Dibrova, I.
    [2019]. Geoecological Situation in Land Use.Environmental Research, Engineering and Management,75(2), 36–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.erem.75.2.22253
    [Google Scholar]
  11. The Kyiv City Development Strategy Until 2025.
    The Kyiv City Development Strategy Until 2025. [2018]. New version. URL: https://dei.kyivcity.gov.ua/files/2018/1/11/Strategia.pdf
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202056009
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202056009
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error