1887
PDF

Abstract

Summary

The crucial aim of the present studies is to show the significant role of the mathematical modeling of leaching and application of the magnetic methods for the identification of the heterogeneities of the agronomic indicators of soils. The studies were performed at the territory of the monitoring fields of NSC “Institute of Soil Science and Agrochemistry Research named after O.N. Sokolovsky”. The area is the Forest-Steppe at the Kharkiv region. The predominant soils are typical chernozemz and podzolic chernozemz (in Sokolovskiy classification). The main parameter to find the correlation with soil physical parameters was magnetic susceptibility MS (χ). The section A is characterized by low values of potential soil losses. At the same time for the section B, the potential washout significantly exceeds the rate of the natural soil formation. The results showed no relationship between MS and macronutrient content (ρ = 0.05...0.27). The relationship between MS and Sorg content is much higher (ρ = 0.45... 0.57). The relation between Sorg and mineral nitrogen content is medium.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202056055
2020-11-10
2024-06-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2020/monitoring-2020/Monitoring2020_55.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202056055&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. De Souza Bahia, A. S. R., Marques, J., La Scala, N., Pellegrino Cerri, C. E., Camargo, L. A.
    [2017] Prediction and mapping of soil attributes using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and magnetic susceptibility.Soil Science Society of America Journal,81(6), 1450–1462.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Evans, M., Heller, F.
    [2003] Environmental magnetism: principles and applications of enviromagnetics. Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Górka-Kostrubiec, B., Teisseyre-Jeleńska, M., Dytłow, S.K.
    [2016] Magnetic properties as indicators of Chernozem soil development.Catena,138,91–102.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ivanik, O., Shevchuk, V., Tustanovska, L., Yanchenko, V., Kravchenko, D.
    [2019] Paleogeography and neotectonics of Kaniv dislocations (Ukrainian Shield, Ukraine) in the Neogene-Quaternary period.Historical Biology,1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Jakšík, O., Kodešová, R., Kapička, A., Klement, A., Fér, M., Nikodem, A.
    [2016] Using magnetic susceptibility mapping for assessing soil degradation due to water erosion.Soil & Water Res.,11,105–113.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kruglov, O.
    [2012] Characteristics of the distribution of the magnetic susceptibility of typical chernozems on the slopes.Visnyk Kharkivs’koho natsional’noho ahrarnoho universytetu,4, 66–69. (in Ukrainian).
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kruglov, O., Menshov, O.
    [2017] To the soil magnetic susceptibility application in modern soil science.16th EAGE International Conference on Geoinformatics-Theoretical and Applied Aspects. Kiev.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kutsenko, M.V.
    [2016] Theoretical bases of soil protection against erosion in Ukraine. Kharkiv. (in Ukrainian).
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kutsenko, M.V., Kruglov, O.V.
    [2010] About developing of the computer technology for the universal soil loss equation (USLE).Geoinformatics,4, 85–89. (in Ukrainian).
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Maslov, B.P., Prodaivoda, G.T., Vyzhva, S.A.
    [2001] Mathematical modeling of elastic wave velocity anisotropy in a cracked geological medium.Geophysical Journal,2(20), 191–212.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Menshov, A.I., Sukhorada, A.V.
    [2012] Soil magnetism in Ukraine.Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu,1, 15–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Menshov, O., Kruglov, O., Sukhorada, A.
    [2012a] Informational content of the soil magnetism indicators for solving agrogeophysical and soil science tasks.Scientific Bulletin of the National mining University,3, 7–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Menshov, O., Kruglov, O., Vyzhva, S., Nazarok, P., Pereira, P., Pastushenko, T.
    [2018] Magnetic methods in tracing soil erosion, Kharkov Region, Ukraine.Stud. Geophys. Geod.,62, 681–696. DOI: 10.1007/S11200‑018‑0803‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/S11200-018-0803-1 [Google Scholar]
  14. Menshov, O., Kuderavets, R., Chobotok, I.
    [2014] Magnetic field and magnetic susceptibility investigation at the hydrocarbon extraction areas in Carpathian Foredeep.EAGE Geoinformatics-13th International Conference on Geoinformatics-Theoretical and Applied Aspects,61–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Menshov, O., Sukhorada, A., Homenko, R., Kruglov, O.
    [2012b] Ultradetailed Environmental Magnetic Investigations in Ukraine.Near Surface Geoscience 2012-18th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers,306.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Montgomery, D.R.
    [2007] Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.,104, 33, 13268–13272.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Pigulevskiy, P., Svistun, V., Slobodyaniuk, S., & Kyryliuk, A.
    [2016] Studying of modern flooding of southwestern part Krivbass by geophysical methods.15th EAGE International Conference on Geoinformatics-Theoretical and Applied Aspects, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers,1, 1–6.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Shevchuk, V. V., Ivanik, O. M., Tustanovska, L. V.
    [2019] Geodynamic conditions of natural hazards within Middle Dnieper region (based on structural-morphometric analysis).Monitoring 2019, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers,1, 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Tyapkin, O.K., Pigulevskiy, P.I., Bilashenko, O.G.
    [2014] Formalization of geoecological mapping by geological-geophysical data.Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu,2,93–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Vyzhva, S.A., Deineko, S.I., Demidov, V.K., Astashkina, O.A.
    [2010] Dynamic geologic-geophysical model of chalky layer and dispersible soils on territory of the RNPP site.9th EAGE International Conference on Geoinformatics-Theoretical and Applied Aspects, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers,184.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Wischmeier, W.H., Smith, D.D.
    [1978] Predicting rainfall erosion losses; a guide to conservation planning.Washington: Department of Agriculture,537.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202056055
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202056055
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error