1887
PDF

Abstract

SUMMARY

Different mechanisms drive marine and terrestrial ecosystems changes. The present study aimed at presenting a conceptual methodology to map marine and terrestrial changes, to recognize their drivers of change, and to measure the impacts of land management in Lithuania. To model changes in the terrestrial part a Cellular automata-Markov chain approach is proposed for the following four scenarios: business as usual; urbanization; land abandonment; and agricultural intensification. To measure its impacts the InVEST habitat model is endorsed. For the marine part, changes will be addressed in land and in the sea applying driver specific approaches. The outcomes can provide decision-makers anticipate futures uncertainties.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2020geo018
2020-05-11
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2020/geoinf2020/GEOINF_2020_18132.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2020geo018&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. ArsanjaniJ.J., HelbichM., KainzW., BolooraniA.D. [2012] Integration of logistic regression, Markov chain and cellular automata models to simulate urban expansion.International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 21,265–275.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BauerM., TomizukaM. [1996] Fuzzy Logic Traction Controllers and their Effect on Longitudinal Vehicle Platoon Systems.Vehicle System Dynamics, 25, 277–303.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BertF., PodestáG., RovereS., MenéndezÁ., NorthM., TataraE., LacianaC., WeberE., ToranzoF. [2011] An agent based model to simulate structural and land use changes in agricultural systems of the argentine pampas.Ecological Modelling, 222, 3486–3499.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BürgiM., HerspergerA.M., SchneebergerN. [2004] Driving forces of landscape change - current and new directions.Landscape Ecology, 19, 857–868.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BusckA.G., KristensenS.B.P. [2014] From agriculture to nature - a study of drivers of land use change in a peri-urban landscape.Geografisk Tidsskrift, 114, 41–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. DezhkamS., AmiriB.J., DarvishsefatA.A. [2017] Performance evaluation of land change simulation models using landscape metrics.Geocarto International, 32, 655–677.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. FuX., WangX., YangY.J. [2018] Deriving suitability factors for CA-Markov land use simulation model based on local historical data.Journal of Environmental Management, 206, 10–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. GilpinW. [2019] Cellular automata as convolutional neural networks.Physical Review E, 100, 32402.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. HouetT., VerburgP.H., LovelandT.R. [2010] Monitoring and modelling landscape dynamics.Landscape Ecology, 25, 163–167.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. LambinE.F., TurnerB.L., GeistH.J., AgbolaS.B., AngelsenA., BruceJ.W., CoomesO.T., DirzoR., FischerG., FolkeC., GeorgeP.S., HomewoodK., ImbernonJ., LeemansR., LiX., MoranE.F., MortimoreM., RamakrishnanP.S., RichardsJ.F., SknesH., SteffenW., StoneG.D., SvedinU., VeldkampT.A., VogelC., XuJ. [2001] The causes of land-use and land-cover change: Moving beyond the myths.Global Environmental Change, 11, 261–269.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. LiT., LiW. [2015] Multiple land use change simulation with Monte Carlo approach and CA-ANN model, a case study in Shenzhen, China.Environmental Systems Research, 4, 1.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. LiuX., LiX., LiuL., HeJ., AiB. [2008] A bottom-up approach to discover transition rules of cellular automata using ant intelligence.International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22, 1247–1269.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. MahinyA., TurnerB. [2003] Modeling past vegetation change through remote sensing and G.I.S: a comparison of neural networks and logistic regression methods. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on GeoComputation. University of Southampton, United Kingdom.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Marta-AlmeidaM., Ruiz-VillarrealM., PereiraJ., OteroP., CiranoM., ZhangX., HetlandR. [2013]. Efficient tools for marine operational forecast and oil spill tracking.Marine Pollution Bulletin, 71, 139–151
    [Google Scholar]
  15. MartyP., DaedenJ.R.M., VogiatzakisI., MathevetR., PottsS., TzanopoulosJ. [2014] Conceptual framework and typology of drivers, in Scaling in Ecology and Biodiversity Conservation. 25–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. MasJ.F., KolbM., PaegelowM., CamachoOlmedo M.T., HouetT. [2014] Inductive pattern-based land use/cover change models: A comparison of four software packages.Environmental Modelling & Software, 51, 94–111.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. MorgadoP., GomesE., Marquesda Costa N. [2014] Competing Visions? Simulating alternative coastal futures using a GIS-ANN web application.Ocean and Coastal Management, 111, 79–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. ParunakH., SavitR., RioloR. [1998] Agent-based modeling vs. equation-based modeling: A case study and users’ guide. In: Proceedings of Multi-agent systems and Agent-based Simulation (MABS’98), 10–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. SangL., ZhangC., YangJ., ZhuD., YunW. [2011] Simulation of land use spatial pattern of towns and villages based on CA – Markov model.Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 54, 938–943.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. ThrallP.H., OakeshottJ.G., FittG., SouthertonS., BurdonJ.J., SheppardA., RussellR.J., ZaluckiM., HeinoM., FordD.R. [2011] Evolution in agriculture: The application of evolutionary approaches to the management of biotic interactions in agro-ecosystems.Evolutionary Applications, 4, 200–215.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. van VlietJ., de GrootH., RietveldP., VerburgP.H. [2015] Manifestations and underlying drivers of agricultural land use change in Europe.Landscape and Urban Planning, 133, 24–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. VerburgP.H., SchotP.P., DijstM.J., VeldkampA. [2004] Land use change modelling: current practice and research priorities.GeoJournal, 61, 309–324.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. von StorchH., OmstedtA., PawlakJ., ReckermannM. [2015] Introduction and Summary. In: Team, T.B.I.I.A. (Eds.) Second Assessment of Climate Change for the Baltic Sea Basin, 1–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. WuF. [2002] Calibration of stochastic cellular automata: the application to rural-urban land conversions.International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 16, 795–818.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. ZimmermannH.J. [2010] Fuzzy set theory.Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 2, 317–332.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2020geo018
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2020geo018
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error