1887

Abstract

Summary

Seismic interpretation i.e. the process of identifying objects of interest in the subsurface using seismic data, can be effectively represented as a semantic segmentation task in machine learning.

Contrary to many semantic segmentation tasks, seismic data present a major challenge with the amount of quality labeled data available. This stems from two factors: first, seismic data can be labeled almost exclusively by trained experts, and second, due to the subsurface’s heterogeneity, labels created for one location are not always transferable to another dataset.

We embrace this data shortage and reformulate the seismic segmentation problem from a fully supervised approach to a few-shot learning task. Our approach builds upon an existing few-shot learning method, which we adapt to the specific requirements of a multi-class subsurface segmentation problem. Furthermore, we address the image-patching locality problem by injecting a global view of the labels into the network during training and inference. Finally, we provide a computationally efficient post-processing approach that can be used with other existing seismic segmentation methods.

The proposed few-shot learning approach for semantic seismic segmentation outperforms a supervised UNet baseline implementation in terms of qualitative and quantitative results while being trained on a total of 10 inlines of each survey

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202113255
2021-10-18
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alaudah, Y., Michałowicz, P., Alfarraj, M. and AlRegib, G.
    [2019] A machine-learning benchmark for facies classification. Interpretation, 7(3), SE175–SE187.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Azad, R., Fayjie, A.R., Kauffman, C., Ayed, I.B., Pedersoli, M. and Dolz, J.
    [2021] On the Texture Bias for Few-Shot CNN Segmentation. WACV’21.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.J., Li, K. and Fei-Fei, L.
    [2009] Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In: 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. Ieee, 248–255.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Mosser, L., Oliveira, R. and Steventon, M.
    [2019] Probabilistic seismic interpretation Using Bayesian neural networks. Conference Proceedings, 81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Vinyals, O., Blundell, C., Lillicrap, T., Kavukcuoglu, K. and Wierstra, D.
    [2016] Matching Networks for One Shot Learning. MICCAI 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. WesternGeco
    . [2012] Parihaka 3D PSTM Final Processing Report. Tech. Rep. New Zealand Petroleum Report 4582, New Zealand Petroleum & Minerals, Wellington.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Wu, X., Liang, L., Shi, Y. and Fomel, S.
    [2019] FaultSeg3D: Using synthetic data sets to train an end-to-end convolutional neural network for 3D seismic fault segmentation. Geophysics, 84(3), IM35–IM45.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202113255
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202113255
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error